But this was not all: five thousand Lacedæmonian Periœki,
each with one light-armed Helot to attend him, were also despatched
to the Isthmus, to take part in the same struggle. Such unparalleled
efforts afford sufficient measure of the alarm which, though late
yet real, now reigned at Sparta. Other Peloponnesian cities followed
the example, and a large army was now collected under the Spartan
Pausanias.
[312] Herodot. ix, 10, 11; Plutarch, Aristeidês, c. 10. Plutarch
had read a decree ascribed to Aristeidês, in which Kimon,
Xanthippus, and Myrônidês, were named envoys to Sparta. But it is
impossible that Xanthippus could have taken part in the embassy,
seeing that he was now in command of the fleet.
Probably the Helots must have followed: one hardly sees how
so great a number could have been all suddenly collected, and
marched off in one night, no preparations having been made
beforehand.
Dr. Thirlwall (Hist. Gr. ch. xvi, p. 366) suspects the
correctness of the narrative of Herodotus, on grounds which do
not appear to me convincing. It seems to me that, after all,
the literal narrative is more probable than anything which we
can substitute in its place. The Spartan foreign policy all
depended on the five ephors; there was no public discussion or
criticism. Now the conduct of these ephors is consistent and
intelligible,—though selfish, narrow-minded, and insensible to
any dangers except what are present and obvious. Nor can I think,
with Dr. Thirlwall, that the manner of communication ultimately
adopted is of the nature of a jest.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account