Mardonius, apprized of this change of position, marched his army also
a little farther to the westward, and posted himself opposite to the
Greeks, divided from them by the river Asôpus. At the suggestion of
the Thebans, he himself, with his Persians and Medes, the picked
men of his army, took post on the left wing, immediately opposite
to the Lacedæmonians on the Greek right, and even extending so far
as to cover the Tegean ranks on the left of the Lacedæmonians:
Baktrians, Indians, Sakæ, with other Asiatics and Egyptians, filled
the centre: and the Greeks and Macedonians in the service of Persia,
the right,—over against the hoplites of Athens. The numbers of these
last-mentioned Greeks Herodotus could not learn, though he estimates
them conjecturally at fifty thousand:[333] nor can we place any
confidence in the total of three hundred thousand, which he gives as
belonging to the other troops of Mardonius, though probably it cannot
have been much less.
[333] Herodot. ix, 31, 32.
In this position lay the two armies, separated only by a narrow space
including the river Asôpus, and each expecting a battle, whilst the
sacrifices on behalf of each were offered up. Pausanias, Mardonius,
and the Greeks in the Persian army, had each a separate prophet to
offer sacrifice, and to ascertain the dispositions of the gods; the
two first had men from the most distinguished prophetic breeds in
Elis,—the latter invited one from Leukas.[334] All received large
pay, and the prophet of Pausanias had indeed been honored with a
recompense above all pay,—the gift of full Spartan citizenship for
himself as well as for his brother. It happened that the prophets
on both sides delivered the same report of their respective
sacrifices,—favorable for resistance if attacked; unfavorable for
beginning the battle. At a moment when doubt and indecision was
the reigning feeling on both sides, this was the safest answer for
the prophet to give, and the most satisfactory for the soldiers
to hear. And though the answer from Delphi had been sufficiently
encouraging, and the kindness of the patron-heroes of Platæa[335]
had been solemnly invoked, yet Pausanias did not venture to cross the
Asôpus and begin the attack, in the face of a pronounced declaration
from his prophet. Nor did even Hegesistratus, the prophet employed
by Mardonius, choose on his side to urge an aggressive movement,
though he had a deadly personal hatred against the Lacedæmonians,
and would have been delighted to see them worsted. There arose
commencements of conspiracy, perhaps encouraged by promises or bribes
from the enemy, among the wealthier Athenian hoplites, to establish
an oligarchy at Athens under Persian supremacy, like that which now
existed at Thebes,—a conspiracy full of danger at such a moment,
though fortunately repressed[336] by Aristeidês, with a hand at
once gentle and decisive. More over, the annoyance inflicted by the
Persian cavalry, under the guidance of the Thebans, was incessant:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account