shortest route through the interior of Thrace to Byzantium, from
whence he passed into Asia: the interior tribes, unconquered and
predatory, harassed his retreat considerably; but we shall find long
afterwards Persian garrisons in possession of many principal places
on the Thracian coast.[373] It will be seen that Artabazus afterwards
rose higher than ever in the estimation of Xerxes.
[369] Herodot. ix, 70; Demosthenês cont. Timokrat. p. 741, c. 33.
Pausanias (i, 27, 2) doubts whether this was really the cimeter
of Mardonius, contending that the Lacedæmonians would never have
permitted the Athenians to take it.
[370] Herodot. ix, 70: compare Æschyl. Pers. 805-824. He singles
out “the Dorian spear” as the great weapon of destruction to the
Persians at Platæa,—very justly. Dr. Blomfield is surprised at
this compliment; but it is to be recollected that all the earlier
part of the tragedy had been employed in setting forth the glory
of Athens at Salamis, and he might well afford to give the
Peloponnesians the credit which they derived at Platæa. Pindar
distributes the honor between Sparta and Athens in like manner
(Pyth. i, 76).
[371] Plutarch, Aristeidês, c. 19. Kleidemus, quoted by Plutarch,
stated that all the fifty-two Athenians who perished belonged
to the tribe Æantis, which distinguished itself in the Athenian
ranks. But it seems impossible to believe that no citizens
belonging to the other nine tribes were killed.
[372] Diodorus, indeed, states that Pausanias was so apprehensive
of the numbers of the Persians, that he forbade his soldiers to
give quarter or take any prisoners (xi, 32); but this is hardly
to be believed, in spite of his assertion. His statement that the
Greeks lost ten thousand men is still less admissible.
[373] Herodot. ix, 89. The allusions of Demosthenês to Perdikkas
king of Macedonia, who is said to have attacked the Persians
on their flight from Platæa, and to have rendered their ruin
complete, are too loose to deserve attention; more especially as
Perdikkas was _not then_ king of Macedonia (Demosthenês cont.
Aristokrat. pp. 687, c. 51; and περὶ Συντάξεως, p. 173, c. 9).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account