Instead of ἦν γὰρ δὴ τοῖσι Ἀθηναίοισι ~πεντήρης~ ἐπὶ Σουνίῳ (vi,
87), I follow the reading proposed by Schömann and sanctioned by
Boëckh—~πεντετηρίς~. It is hardly conceivable that the Athenians
at that time should have had any ships with five banks of oars
(πεντήρης): moreover, apart from this objection, the word
πεντήρης makes considerable embarrassment in the sentence; see
Boëckh, Urkunden über das Attische Seewesen, chap. vii, pp. 75,
76.
The elder Dionysius of Syracuse is said to have been the first
Greek who constructed πεντήρεις or quinquereme ships (Diodor.
xiv, 40, 41).
There were many distinct pentaëterides, or solemnities celebrated
every fifth year, included among the religious customs of Athens:
see Aristoteles, Πολιτ. Fragm. xxvii, ed. Neumann; Pollux, viii,
107.
An Æginetan citizen named Nikodromus took advantage of this war
to further a plot against the government of the island: having
been before, as he thought, unjustly banished, he now organized
a revolt of the people against the ruling oligarchy, concerting
with the Athenians a simultaneous invasion in support of his plan.
Accordingly, on the appointed day he rose with his partisans in
arms and took possession of the Old Town,—a strong post which
had been superseded in course of time by the more modern city on
the sea-shore, less protected though more convenient.[78] But no
Athenians appeared, and without them he was unable to maintain his
footing: he was obliged to make his escape from the island after
witnessing the complete defeat of his partisans,—a large body of
whom, seven hundred in number, fell into the hands of the government,
and were led out for execution. One man alone among these prisoners
burst his chains, fled to the sanctuary of Dêmêtêr Thesmophorus,
and was fortunate enough to seize the handle of the door before
he was overtaken. In spite of every effort to drag him away by
force, he clung to it with convulsive grasp: his pursuers did not
venture to put him to death in such a position, but they severed
the hands from the body and then executed him, leaving the hands
still hanging to and grasping[79] the door-handle, where they seem
to have long remained without being taken off. Destruction of the
seven hundred prisoners does not seem to have drawn down upon the
Æginetan oligarchy either vengeance from the gods or censure from
their contemporaries; but the violation of sanctuary, in the case of
that one unfortunate man whose hands were cut off, was a crime which
the goddess Dêmêtêr never forgave. More than fifty years afterwards,
in the first year of the Peloponnesian war, the Æginetans, having
been previously conquered by Athens, were finally expelled from
their island: such expulsion was the divine judgment upon them for
this ancient impiety, which half a century of continued expiatory
sacrifice had not been sufficient to wipe out.[80]
[78] See Thucyd. i, 8.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account