I imagine the events to have passed as follows: The stratêgi,
with most other officers of the commonwealth, were changed or
reëlected at the beginning of Hekatombæon, the first month of
the Attic year; that is, somewhere about midsummer. Now the
Peloponnesian army, invading Attica about the end of March or
beginning of April, and remaining forty days, would leave the
country about the first week in May. Periklês returned from his
expedition against Peloponnesus shortly after they left Attica;
that is, about the middle of May (Thucyd. ii, 57): there still
remained, therefore, a month or six weeks before his office of
stratêgus naturally expired, and required renewal. It was during
this interval (which Thucydidês expresses by the words ἔτι δ᾽
ἐστρατήγει, ii, 59) that he convoked the assembly and delivered
the harangue recently mentioned.
But when the time for a new election of stratêgi arrived, the
enemies of Periklês opposed his reëlection, and brought a charge
against him, in that trial of accountability to which every
magistrate at Athens was exposed, after his period of office.
They alleged against him some official misconduct in reference
to the public money, and the dikastery visited him with a fine.
His reëlection was thus prevented, and with a man who had been
so often reëlected, this might be loosely called “taking away
the office of general:” so that the language of Plutarch and
Diodorus, as well as the silence of Thucydidês, would, on this
supposition, be justified.
[298] Thucyd. ii, 65.
But that life—long, honorable, and useful—had already been prolonged
considerably beyond the sixtieth year, and there were but too many
circumstances, besides the recent fine, which tended to hasten as
well as to embitter its close. At the very moment when Periklês
was preaching to his countrymen, in a tone almost reproachful, the
necessity of manful and unabated devotion to the common country, in
the midst of private suffering,—he was himself among the greatest of
sufferers, and most hardly pressed to set the example of observing
his own precepts. The epidemic carried off not merely his two sons,
the only two legitimate, Xanthippus and Paralus, but also his sister,
several other relatives, and his best and most useful political
friends. Amidst this train of domestic calamities, and in the funeral
obsequies of so many of his dearest friends, he remained master of
his grief, and maintained his habitual self-command, until the last
misfortune,—the death of his favorite son Paralus, which left his
house without any legitimate representative to maintain the family
and the hereditary sacred rites. On this final blow, though he strove
to command himself as before, yet, at the obsequies of the young man,
when it became his duty to place a garland on the dead body, his
grief became uncontrollable, and he burst out, for the first time of
his life, into profuse tears and sobbing.[299]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account