consequence would be the loss of that country, and of course of
our Mediterranean trade. We should be sorry to set all our slaves
free in our plantations.’”
The prodigious sum of damages awarded by the jury, shows the
strength of their sympathy with this Minorquin plaintiff against
the English officer. I doubt not that the feeling of the
dikastery at Athens was much of the same kind, and often quite as
strong; sincerely disposed to protect the subject-allies against
misconduct of Athenian trierarchs, or inspectors.
The feelings expressed in the speech above cited would also often
find utterance from Athenian orators in the assembly; and it
would not be difficult to produce parallel passages, in which
these orators imply discontent on the part of the allies to be
the natural state of things, such as Athens could not hope to
escape. The speech here given shows that such feelings arise,
almost inevitably, out of the uncomfortable relation of two
governments, one supreme and the other subordinate. They are not
the product of peculiar cruelty and oppression on the part of the
Athenian democracy, as Mr. Mitford and so many others have sought
to prove.
Nearly the whole of the Grecian world, putting aside Italian,
Sicilian, and African Greeks, was at this time included either in
the alliance of Lacedæmon or in that of Athens, so that the truce
of thirty years insured a suspension of hostilities everywhere.
Moreover, the Lacedæmonian confederates had determined by majority
of votes to refuse the request of Samos for aid in her revolt
against Athens: whereby it seemed established, as practical
international law, that neither of these two great aggregate bodies
should intermeddle with the other, and that each should restrain
or punish its own disobedient members.[92] Of this refusal, which
materially affected the course of events, the main advisers had
been the Corinthians, in spite of that fear and dislike of Athens
which prompted many of the allies to vote for war.[93] The position
of the Corinthians was peculiar; for while Sparta and her other
allies were chiefly land-powers, Corinth had been from early times
maritime, commercial, and colonizing,—she had been indeed once the
first naval power in Greece, along with Ægina; but either she had
not increased it at all during the last forty years, or, if she
had, her comparative naval importance had been entirely sunk by the
gigantic expansion of Athens. The Corinthians had both commerce and
colonies,—Leukas, Anaktorium, Ambrakia, Korkyra, etc., along or near
the coast of Epirus: they had also their colony Potidæa, situated
on the isthmus of Pallênê, in Thrace, and intimately connected with
them: and the interest of their commerce made them extremely averse
to any collision with the superior navy of the Athenians. It was this
consideration which had induced them to resist the impulse of the
Lacedæmonian allies towards war on behalf of Samos: for though their
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account