[113] See the geographical Commentary of Gatterer upon Thrace,
embodied in Poppo, Prolegg. ad Thucyd. vol. ii, ch. 29.
The words τὰ ἐπὶ Θρᾴκης—τὰ ἐπὶ Θρᾴκης χωρία (Thucyd. ii, 29)
denote generally the towns in Chalkidikê,—places _in the
direction or in the skirts of_ Thrace, rather than parts of
Thrace itself.
[114] Thucyd. i, 57; ii, 100.
[115] See two remarkable passages illustrating this difference,
Thucyd. iv, 120-122.
[116] Thucyd. ii, 29-98. Isokratês has a remarkable passage on
this subject in the beginning of Or. v, ad Philippum, sects.
5-7. After pointing out the imprudence of founding a colony
on the skirts of the territory of a powerful potentate, and
the excellent site which had been chosen far Kyrênê, as being
near only to feeble tribes,—he goes so far as to say that
the possession of Amphipolis would be injurious rather than
beneficial to Athens, because it would render her dependent upon
Philip, from his power of annoying her colonists,—just as she
had been dependent before upon Mêdokus, the Thracian king, in
consequence of her colonists in the Chersonese,—ἀναγκασθησόμεθα
τὴν αὐτὴν εὔνοιαν ἔχειν τοῖς σοῖς πράγμασι διὰ τοὺς ἐνταῦθα (at
Amphipolis) κατοικοῦντας, οἵαν περ εἴχομεν Μηδόκῳ τῷ παλαιῷ διὰ
τοὺς ἐν Χεῤῥονήσῳ γεωργοῦντας.
[117] Thucyd. i, 56, 57.
The Athenians were not ignorant both of his hostile preparations and
of the dangers which awaited them from Corinth after the Korkyræan
sea-fight; immediately after which they sent to take precautions
against the revolt of Potidæa; requiring the inhabitants to take down
their wall on the side of Pellênê, so as to leave the town open on
the side of the peninsula, or on what may be called the sea-side,
and fortified only towards the mainland,—requiring them farther both
to deliver hostages and to dismiss the annual magistrates who came
to them from Corinth. An Athenian armament of thirty triremes and
one thousand hoplites, under Archestratus and ten others, despatched
to act against Perdikkas in the Thermaic gulf, was directed at the
same time to enforce these requisitions against Potidæa, and to
repress any dispositions to revolt among the neighboring Chalkidians.
Immediately on receiving these requisitions, the Potidæans sent
envoys both to Athens, for the purpose of evading and gaining
time,—and to Sparta, in conjunction with Corinth, in order to
determine a Lacedæmonian invasion of Attica, in the event of Potidæa
being attacked by Athens. From the Spartan authorities they obtained
a distinct affirmative promise, in spite of the thirty years’ truce
still subsisting: at Athens they had no success, and they accordingly
openly revolted (seemingly about midsummer, 432 B.C.), at the same
time that the armament under Archestratus sailed. The Chalkidians and
Bottiæans revolted at the same time, at the express instigation of
Corinth, accompanied by solemn oaths and promises of assistance.[118]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account