The story of Lykurgus, that the Athenian people, on the
proposition of Kritias, exhumed and brought to trial the dead
body of Phrynichus, and that Aristarchus and Alexiklês were
put to death for undertaking its defence, is certainly in part
false, and probably wholly false. Aristarchus was then at Œnoê,
Alexiklês at Dekeleia.
[120] Onomaklês had been one of the colleagues of Phrynichus,
as general of the armament in Ionia, in the preceding autumn
(Thucyd. viii, 25).
In one of the Biographies of Thucydidês (p. xxii, in Dr. Arnold’s
edition), it is stated that Onomaklês was executed along with
the other two; but the document cited in the Pseudo-Plutarch
contradicts this.
[121] Plutarch, Vit. x, Oratt. p. 834; compare Xenophon,
Hellenic. i, 7, 22.
Apolêxis was one of the accusers of Antiphon: see Harpokration,
v. Στασιώτης.
Though all the three persons thus indicated were at Athens, or at
least were supposed to be there, on the day when this resolution was
passed by the senate, yet, before it was executed, Onomaklês had
fled; so that Antiphon and Archeptolemus only were imprisoned for
trial. They too must have had ample opportunity for leaving the city,
and we might have presumed that Antiphon would have thought it quite
as necessary to retire as Peisander and Alexiklês. So acute a man as
he, at no time very popular, must have known that now at least he had
drawn the sword against his fellow-citizens in a manner which could
never be forgiven. However, he chose voluntarily to stay: and this
man, who had given orders for taking off so many of the democratical
speakers by private assassination, received from the democracy, when
triumphant, full notice and fair trial on a distinct and specific
charge. The speech which he made in his defence, though it did not
procure acquittal, was listened to, not merely with patience, but
with admiration; as we may judge from the powerful and lasting effect
which it produced. Thucydidês describes it as the most magnificent
defence against a capital charge which had ever come before him;[122]
and the poet Agathon, doubtless a hearer, warmly complimented
Antiphon on his eloquence; to which the latter replied, that the
approval of one such discerning judge was in his eyes an ample
compensation for the unfriendly verdict of the multitude. Both he and
Archeptolemus were found guilty by the dikastery and condemned to the
penalties of treason. They were handed over to the magistrates called
the Eleven, the chiefs of executive justice at Athens, to be put to
death by the customary draught of hemlock. Their properties were
confiscated, their houses were directed to be razed, and the vacant
site to be marked by columns, with the inscription: “The residence
of Antiphon the traitor,—of Archeptolemus the traitor.” They were
not permitted to be buried either in Attica, or in any territory
subject to Athenian dominion.[123] Their children, both legitimate
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account