Polyænus (ii, 14, 1) in his account of this transaction,
expressly mentions that the Hippeis or guards who accompanied
Kinadon, put him to the torture (στρεβλώσαντες) when they seized
him, in order to extort the names of his accomplices. Even
without express testimony, we might pretty confidently have
assumed this. From a man of spirit like Kinadon, they were not
likely to obtain such betrayal without torture.
I had affirmed that in the description of this transaction given
by Xenophon, it did not appear whether Kinadon was able to write
or not. My assertion was controverted by Colonel Mure (in his
Reply to my Appendix), who cited the words φέρων τὰ ὀνόματα ὧν
Κινάδων ~ἀπέγραψε~, as containing an affirmation from Xenophon
that Kinadon could write.
In my judgment, these words, taken in conjunction with what
precedes, and with the probabilities of the fact described, do
not contain such an affirmation.
The guards were instructed to seize Kinadon, and after _having
heard from Kinadon who his accomplices were, to write the names
down and send them to the ephors_. It is to be presumed that they
executed these instructions as given; the more so, as what they
were commanded to do, was at once the safest and the most natural
proceeding. For Kinadon was a man distinguished for personal
_stature and courage_ (τὸ εἶδος καὶ τὴν ψυχὴν εὔρωστος, iii, 3,
5) so that those who seized him would find it an indispensable
precaution to pinion his arms. Assuming even that Kinadon could
write,—yet, if he were to write, he must have his right arm
free. And why should the guards take this risk, when all which
the ephors required was, that Kinadon should _pronounce_ the
names, to be written down by others? With a man of the qualities
of Kinadon, it probably required the most intense pressure to
force him to betray his comrades, even by word of mouth; it would
probably be more difficult still, to force him to betray them by
the more deliberate act of writing.
I conceive that ἧκεν ἱππεὺς, φέρων τὰ ὀνόματα ὧν ὁ Κινάδων
ἀπέγραψε is to be construed with reference to the preceding
sentence, and announces the carrying into effect of the
instructions then reported as given by the ephors. “A guard came,
bearing the names of those whom Kinadon had given in.” It is not
necessary to suppose that Kinadon had written down these names
with his own hand.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account