Diodorus (xiv, 80) professes to describe this battle; but his
description is hardly to be reconciled with that of Xenophon,
which is better authority. Among other points of difference,
Diodorus affirms that the Persians had fifty thousand infantry;
and Pausanias also states (iii, 9, 3) that the number of Persian
infantry in this battle was greater than had ever been got
together since the times of Darius and Xerxes Whereas, Xenophon
expressly states that the Persian infantry had not come up, and
took no part in the battle.
The career of that timid and treacherous satrap now approached its
close. The Persians in or near Sardis loudly complained of him as
leaving them undefended, from cowardice and anxiety for his own
residence in Karia; while the court of Susa was now aware that
the powerful reinforcement which had been sent to him last year,
intended to drive Agesilaus out of Asia, had been made to achieve
absolutely nothing. To these grounds of just dissatisfaction was
added a court intrigue; to which, and to the agency of a person yet
more worthless and cruel than himself, Tissaphernes fell a victim.
The queen mother, Parysatis, had never forgiven him for having been
one of the principal agents in the defeat and death of her son Cyrus.
Her influence being now reëstablished over the mind of Artaxerxes,
she took advantage of the existing discredit of the satrap to get an
order sent down for his deposition and death. Tithraustes, the bearer
of this order, seized him by stratagem at Kolossæ in Phrygia, while
he was in the bath, and caused him to be beheaded.[496]
[496] Plutarch. Artaxerx. c. 23; Diodor. xiv, 80; Xen. Hellen.
iii, 4, 25.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account