[101] We know from Plutarch (Artaxer. c. 13) that Ktesias
distinctly asserted himself to have been present at this
interview, and I see no reason why we should not believe him.
Plutarch indeed rejects his testimony as false, affirming that
Xenophon would certainly have mentioned him, had he been there;
but such an objection seems to me insufficient. Nor is it
necessary to construe the words of Xenophon, ἦν δ᾽ αὐτῶν Φαλῖνος
~εἶς Ἕλλην~, (ii, 1, 7) so strictly as to negative the presence
of one or two other Greeks. Phalinus is thus specified because he
was the spokesman of the party—a military man.
[102] Xen. Anab. ii, 1, 12 μὴ οὖν οἴου τὰ μόνα ἡμῖν ἀγαθὰ ὄντα
ὑμῖν παραδώσειν· ἀλλὰ σὺν τούτοις καὶ περὶ τῶν ὑμετέρων ἀγαθῶν
μαχούμεθα.
[103] Xen. Anab. ii, 1, 14-22. Diodorus (xiv, 25) is somewhat
copious in his account of the interview with Phalinus. But he
certainly followed other authorities besides Xenophon, if even it
be true that he had Xenophon before him. The allusion to the past
heroism of Leonidas seems rather in the style of Ephorus.
Shortly after the departure of Phalinus, the envoys despatched to
Ariæus returned; communicating his reply, that the Persian grandees
would never tolerate any pretensions on his part to the crown, and
that he intended to depart early the next morning on his return; if
the Greeks wished to accompany him, they must join him during the
night. In the evening, Klearchus, convening the generals and the
lochages (or captains of lochi), acquainted them that the morning
sacrifice had been of a nature to forbid their marching against
the king,—a prohibition of which he now understood the reason,
from having since learnt that the king was on the other side of
the Tigris, and therefore out of their reach,—but that it was
favorable for rejoining Ariæus. He gave directions accordingly for a
night-march back along the Euphrates, to the station where they had
passed the last night but one prior to the battle. The other Grecian
generals, without any formal choice of Klearchus as chief, tacitly
acquiesced in his orders, from a sense of his superior decision and
experience, in an emergency when no one knew what to propose. The
night-march was successfully accomplished, so that they joined Ariæus
at the preceding station about midnight; not without the alarming
symptom, however, that Miltokythês the Thracian deserted to the king,
at the head of three hundred and forty of his countrymen, partly
horse, partly foot.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account