But the words which occasion most perplexity are those which
follow: “Epaminondas repulses the assailants, and _having come to
the city itself of the Athenians_, when Iphikrates forbade the
Athenians to come out and fight, he (Epaminondas) again marched
away to Thebes.”
What are we to understand _by the city of the Athenians_? The
natural sense of the word is certainly Athens; and so most of
the commentators relate. But when the battle was fought between
Corinth and Kenchreæ, can we reasonably believe that Epaminondas
pursued the fugitives to Athens—through the city of Megara, which
lay in the way, and which seems then (Diodor. xv, 68) to have
been allied with Athens? The station of Iphikrates was _Corinth_;
from thence he had marched out,—and thither his cavalry, when
repulsed, would go back, as the nearest shelter.
Dr. Thirlwall (Hist. Greece, vol. v, ch. 39, p. 141) understands
Pausanias to mean, that Iphikrates retired with his defeated
cavalry to Corinth,—that Epaminondas then marched straight on
to Athens,—and that Iphikrates followed him. “Possibly (he
says) the only mistake in this statement is, that it represents
the _presence_ of Iphikrates, instead of his _absence_, as the
cause which prevented the Athenians from fighting. According to
Xenophon, Iphikrates must have been in the rear of Epaminondas.”
I cannot think that we obtain this from the words of Xenophon.
Neither he nor Plutarch countenance the idea that Epaminondas
marched to the walls of Athens, which supposition is derived
solely from the words of Pausanias. Xenophon and Plutarch
intimate only that Iphikrates interposed some opposition, and not
very effective opposition, near Corinth, to the retreating march
of Epaminondas, from Peloponnesus into Bœotia.
That Epaminondas should have marched to Athens at all, under
the circumstances of the case, when he was returning to Bœotia,
appears to me in itself improbable, and to be rendered still more
improbable by the silence of Xenophon. Nor is it indispensable
to put this construction even upon Pausanias; who may surely
have meant by the words—πρὸς αὐτὸ Ἀθηναίων τὸ ἄστυ,—not Athens,
but _the city then occupied by the Athenians engaged_,—that is,
_Corinth_. _The city of the Athenians_, in reference to this
battle, was Corinth; it was the city out of which the troops of
Iphikrates had just marched, and to which, on being defeated,
they naturally retired for safety, pursued by Epaminondas to the
gates. The statement of Pausanias,—that Iphikrates would not let
the Athenians in the town (Corinth) go out to fight,—then follows
naturally. Epaminondas, finding that they would not come out,
drew back his troops, and resumed his march to Thebes.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account