The description given by Xenophon of Mantinea as it stood in
385 B.C., with the river Ophis, a considerable stream, passing
through the middle of it, is perfectly clear. When the city,
after having been now broken up, was rebuilt in 370 B.C., the
site was so far changed that the river no longer ran through it.
But the present course of the river Ophis, as given by excellent
modern topographical examiners, Colonel Leake and Kiepert, is
at a very considerable distance from the Mantinea rebuilt in
370 B.C.; the situation of which is accurately known, since
the circuit of its walls still remains distinctly marked. The
Mantinea of 370 B.C., therefore, as compared with the Mantinea in
385 B.C., must have been removed to a considerable distance—or
else the river Ophis must have altered its course. Colonel
Leake supposes that the Ophis had been artificially diverted
from its course, in order that it might be brought through the
town of Mantinea; a supposition, which he founds on the words
of Xenophon,—σοφωτέρων γενομένων ταύτῃ γε τῶν ἀνθρώπων, τὸ μὴ
διὰ τειχῶν ποταμὸν ποιεῖσθαι (Hellen. v, 2, 7). But it is very
difficult to agree with him on this point, when we look at his
own map (annexed to the Peloponnesiaca) of the Mantinice and
Tegeatis, and observe the great distance between the river Ophis
and Mantinea; nor do the words of Xenophon seem necessarily to
imply any artificial diversion of the river. It appears easier to
believe that the river has changed its course. See Leake, Travels
in Morea, vol. iii, ch. xxiv, p. 71; and Peloponnesiaca, p. 380;
and Ernst Curtius, Peloponnesos, p. 239—who still, however,
leaves the point obscure.
[91] Diodor. xv, 5.
Though nothing was said in the terms of it about the chiefs of the
Mantinean democratical government, yet these latter, conscious that
they were detested both by their own oligarchical opposition and
by the Lacedæmonians, accounted themselves certain of being put
to death. And such would assuredly have been their fate, had not
Pausanias (the late king of Sparta, now in exile at Tegea), whose
good opinion they had always enjoyed, obtained as a personal favor
from his son Agesipolis the lives of the most obnoxious, sixty in
number, on condition that they should depart into exile. Agesipolis
had much difficulty in accomplishing the wishes of his father. His
Lacedæmonian soldiers were ranged in arms on both sides of the
gate by which the obnoxious men went out; and Xenophon notices it
as a signal mark of Lacedæmonian discipline, that they could keep
their spears unemployed when disarmed enemies were thus within
their reach; especially as the oligarchical Mantineans manifested
the most murderous propensities, and were exceedingly difficult to
control.[92] As at Peiræus before, so here at Mantinea again,—the
liberal, but unfortunate, king Pausanias is found interfering in the
character of mediator to soften the ferocity of political antipathies.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account