Of all these princes descended from the elder Dionysius, not one
inherited the sobriety and temperance which had contributed so
much to his success. All of them are said to have been of drunken
and dissolute habits[283]—Dionysius the younger, and his son
Apollokrates, as well as Hipparinus and Nysæus. Hipparinus was
assassinated while in a fit of intoxication; so that Nysæus became
the representative of this family, until he was expelled from Ortygia
by the return of the younger Dionysius.
[283] Aristotle and Theopompus, ap. Athenæum, x. p. 435, 436;
Theopomp. Fragm. 146, 204, 213, ed. Didot.
That prince, since his first expulsion from Syracuse, had chiefly
resided at Lokri in Italy, of which city his mother Doris was a
native. It has already been stated that the elder Dionysius had
augmented and nursed up Lokri by every means in his power, as an
appurtenance of his own dominion at Syracuse. He had added to its
territory all the southernmost peninsula of Italy (comprehended
within a line drawn from the Gulf of Terina to that of Skylletium),
once belonging to Rhegium, Kaulonia, and Hipponium. But though the
power of Lokri was thus increased, it had ceased to be a free city,
being converted into a dependency of the Dionysian family.[284] As
such, it became the residence of the second Dionysius, when he could
no longer maintain himself in Syracuse. We know little of what he
did; though we are told that he revived a portion of the dismantled
city of Rhegium under the name of Phœbia.[285] Rhegium itself
reappears shortly afterwards as a community under its own name, and
was probably reconstituted at the complete downfall of the second
Dionysius.
[284] Aristotel. Politic. v. 6, 7.
[285] Strabo, vi. p. 258.
The season between 356-346 B. C., was one of great pressure and
suffering for all the Italiot Greeks, arising from the increased
power of the inland Lucanians and Bruttians. These Bruttians, who
occupied the southernmost Calabria, were a fraction detached from
the general body of Lucanians and self-emancipated; having consisted
chiefly of indigenous rural serfs in the mountain communities,
who threw off the sway of their Lucanian masters, and formed an
independent aggregate for themselves. These men, especially in
the energetic effort which marked their early independence, were
formidable enemies of the Greeks on the coast, from Tarentum to the
Sicilian strait; and more than a match even for the Spartans and
Epirots invited over by the Greeks as auxiliaries.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account