[411] Xenoph. Hellen. vi. 5, 23; vii 5, 4. Diodor. xv. 62.
The Akarnanians had been allies of Thebes at the time of the
first expedition of Epaminondas into Peloponnesus; whether they
remained so at the time of his last expedition, is not certain.
But as the Theban ascendency over Thessaly was much greater at
the last of those two periods than at the first, we may be sure
that they had not lost their hold upon the Lokrians and Malians
who (as well as the Phokians) lay between Bœotia and Thessaly.
But ever and above allies without Bœotia, Thebes had prodigiously
increased the power of her city within Bœotia. She had appropriated
to herself the territories of Platæa and Thespiæ on her southern
frontier, and of Koroneia and Orchomenus near upon her northern; by
conquest and partial expulsion of their prior inhabitants. How and
when these acquisitions had been brought about, has been explained
in my preceding volume:[412] here I merely recall the fact, to
appreciate the position of Thebes in 359 B. C.—that these four
towns, having been in 372 B. C. autonomous—joined with her only by
the definite obligations of the Bœotian confederacy—and partly even
in actual hostility against her—had now lost their autonomy with
their free citizens, and had become absorbed into her property and
sovereignty. The domain of Thebes thus extended across Bœotia from
the frontiers of Phokis[413] on the north-west to the frontiers of
Attica on the south.
[412] Vol. X. Ch. lxxvii. p. 161; Ch. lxxviii. p. 195; Ch. lxxx.
p. 312.
[413] Orchomenus was conterminous with the Phokian territory
(Pausanias, ix. 39, 1.)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account