Notwithstanding this encouragement,
however, the three young men, still trembling at the magnitude of the
risk, hesitated to mount the stair; nor could they be prevailed upon
to do so, except by her distinct threat, that if they flinched, she
would awaken Alexander and expose them. At length they mounted, and
entered the bed-chamber, wherein a lamp was burning; while Thêbê,
having opened the door for them, again closed it, and posted herself
to hold the bar. The brothers then approached the bed: one seized the
sleeping despot by the feet, another by the hair of his head, and the
third with a sword thrust him through.[422]
[419] Demosthenes adv. Polyklem. p. 1207. s. 5, 6; Diodor. xv.
61-95. See my previous Volume X. Ch. lxxx. p. 370.
[420] I concur with Mr. Fynes Clinton (Fast. Hellen. ad. ann.
359 B. C., and Appendix, c. 15) in thinking that this is the
probable date of the assassination of Alexander of Pheræ; which
event is mentioned by Didorus (xvi. 14) under the year 357-356 B.
C., yet in conjunction with a series of subsequent events, and
in a manner scarcely constraining us to believe that he meant to
affirm the assassination itself as having actually taken place in
that year.
To the arguments adduced by Mr. Clinton, another may be added,
borrowed from the expression of Plutarch (Pelopidas, c. 35)
ὀλίγον ὕστερον. He states that the assassination of Alexander
occurred “a little while” after the period when the Thebans,
avenging the death of Pelopidas, reduced that despot to
submission. Now this reduction cannot be placed later than 363 B.
C. That interval therefore which Plutarch calls “a little while,”
will be three years, if we place the assassination in 359 B. C.,
six years, if we place it in 357-356 B. C. Three years is a more
suitable interpretation of the words than _six_ years.
[421] Xenoph. Hiero, i. 38; ii. 10; iii. 8.
[422] Xenoph. Hellen. vi. 4, 36, 37; Plutarch, Pelopidas, c. 35;
Conon, ap. Photium, Narr. 50. Codex, 186; Cicero, de Offic. ii.
7. The details of the assassination, given in these authors,
differ. I have principally followed Xenophon, and have admitted
nothing positively inconsistent with his statements.
After successfully and securely consummating this deed, popular on
account of the odious character of the slain despot, Thêbê contrived
to win over the mercenary troops, and to insure the sceptre to
herself and her eldest brother Tisiphonus. After this change, it
would appear that the power of the new princes was not so great as
that of Alexander had been, so that additional elements of weakness
and discord were introduced into Thessaly. This is to be noted as one
of the material circumstances paving the way for Philip of Macedon to
acquire ascendency in Greece—as will hereafter appear.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account