We see thus that the claim now advanced by Philomelus was not
fictitious, but genuine, and felt by himself as well as by other
Phokians to be the recovery of an ancient privilege, lost only
through superior force.[520] His views being heartily embraced by
his countrymen, he was nominated general with full powers. It was
his first measure to go to Sparta, upon whose aid he counted, in
consequence of the heavy fine which still stood imposed upon her
by the Amphiktyonic sentence. He explained his views privately to
king Archidamus, engaging, if the Phokians should become masters
of the temple, to erase the sentence and fine from the column of
record. Archidamus did not dare to promise him public countenance or
support; the rather, as Sparta had always been the chief supporter
of the Delphian presidency (as against the Phokian) over the temple.
But in secret he warmly encouraged the scheme; furnishing a sum
of fifteen talents, besides a few mercenary soldiers, towards its
execution. With this aid Philomelus returned home, provided an equal
sum of fifteen talents from his own purse, and collected a body of
peltasts, Phokians as well as strangers. He then executed his design
against Delphi, attacking suddenly both the town and the temple,
and capturing them, as it would appear, with little opposition. To
the alarmed Delphians, generally, he promised security and good
treatment; but he put to death the members of the Gens (or Clan)
called Thrakidæ, and seized their property: these men constituted one
among several holy Gentes, leading conductors of the political and
religious agency of the place.[521] It is probable, that when thus
suddenly assailed, they had sent to solicit aid from their neighbors,
the Lokrians of Amphissa; for Philomelus was scarcely in possession
of Delphi, when these latter marched up to the rescue. He defeated
them however with serious loss, and compelled them to return home.
[520] Justin (viii. 1) takes no notice of this first position of
the Phokians in regard to the temple of Delphi. He treats them as
if they had been despoilers of the temple even at first; “velut
deo irascentes.”
[521] Diodor. xvi. 24. Hesychius (v. Λαφριάδαι) mentions another
phratry or gens at Delphi, called Laphriadæ. See Wilhelm Götte,
Das Delphische Orakel, p. 83. Leipsic, 1839.
It is stated by Pausanias, that the Phokians were bent upon
dealing with Delphi and its inhabitants in the harshest manner;
intending to kill all the men of military age, to sell the
remaining population as slaves, and to raze the whole town to
the ground. Archidamus, king of Sparta, (according to Pausanias)
induced the Phokians to abandon this resolution (Pausan. iii. 10,
4).
At what moment the Phokians ever determined on this step—or,
indeed, whether they ever really determined on it—we cannot feel
any certainty. Nor can we decide confidently, whether Pausanias
borrowed the statement from Theopompus, whom he quotes a little
before.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account