Kallisthenes (ap. Polyb. xii. 22) stated that Alexander had
laid his plan of attack with a view to bear upon the person of
Darius, which is not improbable (compare Xenoph. Anab. i. 8, 22),
and was in fact realized, since the first successful charge of
the Macedonians came so near to Darius as to alarm him for the
safety of his own person. To the question put by Polybius—How
did Alexander know in what part of the army Darius was?—we may
reply, that the chariot and person of Darius would doubtless be
conspicuous: moreover the Persian kings were habitually in the
centre—and Cyrus the younger, at the battle of Kunaxa, directed
the attack to be made exactly against the person of his brother
Artaxerxes.
After the battle of Kunaxa, Artaxerxes assumed to himself the
honor of having slain Cyrus with his own hand, and put to death
those who had really done the deed, because they boasted of it
(Plutarch, Artax. 16).
This great battle—we ought rather to say, that which ought to have
been a great battle—was thus lost,—through the giving way of the
Asiatic hoplites on the Persian left, and the immediate flight of
Darius,—within a few minutes after its commencement. But the centre
and right of the Persians, not yet apprised of these misfortunes,
behaved with gallantry. When Alexander made his rapid dash forward
with the right, under his own immediate command, the phalanx in his
left centre (which was under Kraterus and Parmenio) either did not
receive the same accelerating order, or found itself both retarded
and disordered by greater steepness in the banks of the Pinarus.
Here it was charged by the Grecian mercenaries, the best troops in
the Persian service. The combat which took place was obstinate, and
the Macedonian loss not inconsiderable; the general of division,
Ptolemy son of Seleukus, with 120 of the front rank men or choice
phalangites, being slain. But presently Alexander, having completed
the rout on the enemies’ left, brought back his victorious troops
from the pursuit, attacked the Grecian mercenaries in flank, and gave
decisive superiority to their enemies. These Grecian mercenaries
were beaten and forced to retire. On finding that Darius himself
had fled, they got away from the field as well as they could, yet
seemingly in good order. There is even reason to suppose that a part
of them forced their way up the mountains or through the Macedonian
line, and made their escape southward.[279]
[279] This is the supposition of Mr. Williams, and it appears
to me probable though Mr. Ainsworth calls it in question, in
consequence of the difficulties of the ground southward of
Myriandrus towards the sea. [See Mr. Ainsworth’s Essay on the
Cilician and Syrian Gates, Journal of the Geograph. Society,
1838, p. 194]. These Greeks, being merely fugitives with arms in
their hands—with neither cavalry nor baggage—could make their way
over very difficult ground.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account