The sight of these mutilated Greeks was well calculated to excite
not merely sympathy for them, but rage against the Persians, in
the bosoms of all spectators. Alexander seized this opportunity,
as well for satiating the anger and cupidity of his soldiers, as
for manifesting himself in his self-assumed character of avenger of
Greece against the Persians, to punish the wrongs done by Xerxes a
century and a half before. He was now amidst the native tribes and
seats of the Persians, the descendants of those rude warriors who,
under the first Cyrus, had overspread Western Asia from the Indus
to the Ægean. In this their home the Persian kings had accumulated
their national edifices, their regal sepulchres, the inscriptions
commemorative of their religious or legendary sentiment, with many
trophies and acquisitions arising out of their conquests. For the
purposes of the Great King’s empire, Babylon, or Susa, or Ekbatana,
were more central and convenient residences; but Persepolis was
still regarded as the heart of Persian nationality. It was the chief
magazine, though not the only one, of those annual accumulations
from the imperial revenue, which each king successively increased,
and which none seems to have ever diminished. Moreover, the Persian
grandees and officers, who held the lucrative satrapies and posts
of the empire, were continually sending wealth home to Persis, for
themselves or their relatives. We may therefore reasonably believe
what we find asserted, that Persepolis possessed at this time more
wealth, public and private, than any place within the range of
Grecian or Macedonian knowledge.[419]
[419] Diodor. xvii. 70. πλουσιωτάτης οὔσης τῶν ὑπὸ τὸν ἥλιον,
etc. Curtius, v. 6, 2, 3.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account