Darius was now a fugitive, with the mere title of king, and with a
simple body-guard rather than an army. On leaving Arbêla after the
defeat, he had struck in an easterly direction across the mountains
into Media; having only a few attendants round him, and thinking
himself too happy to preserve his own life from an indefatigable
pursuer.[428] He calculated that, once across these mountains,
Alexander would leave him for a time unmolested, in haste to march
southward for the purpose of appropriating the great and real prizes
of the campaign—Babylon, Susa, and Persepolis. The last struggles of
this ill-starred prince will be recounted in another chapter.
[428] Arrian, iii. 16, 1-4.
CHAPTER XCIV.
MILITARY OPERATIONS AND CONQUESTS OF ALEXANDER, AFTER HIS
WINTER-QUARTERS IN PERSIS, DOWN TO HIS DEATH AT BABYLON.
From this time forward to the close of Alexander’s life—a period of
about seven years—his time was spent in conquering the eastern half
of the Persian empire, together with various independent tribes lying
beyond its extreme boundary. But neither Greece, nor Asia Minor, nor
any of his previous western acquisitions, was he ever destined to see
again.
Now, in regard to the history of Greece—the subject of these
volumes—the first portion of Alexander’s Asiatic campaigns (from
his crossing the Hellespont to the conquest of Persis, a period of
four years, March 334 B. C., to March 330 B. C.), though not of
direct bearing, is yet of material importance. Having in his first
year completed the subjugation of the Hellenic world, he had by
these subsequent campaigns absorbed it as a small fraction into the
vast Persian empire, renovated under his imperial sceptre. He had
accomplished a result substantially the same as would have been
brought about if the invasion of Greece by Xerxes, destined, a
century and a half before, to incorporate Greece with the Persian
monarchy, had succeeded instead of failing.[429] Towards the kings of
Macedonia alone, the subjugation of Greece would never have become
complete, so long as she could receive help from the native Persian
kings, who were perfectly adequate as a countervailing and tutelary
force, had they known how to play their game. But all hope for Greece
from without was extinguished, when Babylon, Susa, and Persepolis
became subject to the same ruler as Pella and Amphipolis—and that
ruler too, the ablest general, and most insatiate aggressor, of
his age; to whose name was attached the prestige of success almost
superhuman. Still, against even this overwhelming power, some of the
bravest of the Greeks at home tried to achieve their liberation with
the sword: we shall see presently how sadly the attempt miscarried.
[429] Compare the language addressed by Alexander to his weary
soldiers, on the banks of the Hyphasis (Arrian, v. 26), with that
which Herodotus puts into the mouth of Xerxes, when announcing
his intended expedition against Greece (Herodot. vii. 8).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account