actual kingdom, but enlarging it by new additions. He found in
Porus a faithful and efficient ally. This was the greatest day of
Alexander’s life; if we take together the splendor and difficulty of
the military achievement, and the generous treatment of his conquered
opponent.[540]
[538] The halt of thirty days is mentioned by Diodorus, xvii. 86.
For the proof that these operations took place in winter, see the
valuable citation from Aristobulus given in Strabo (xv. p. 691).
[539] Arrian. v. 19, 1. Ἀλέξανδρος δὲ ὡς προσάγοντα ἐπύθετο,
προσιππεύσας πρὸ τῆς τάξεως σὺν ὀλίγοις τῶν ἑταίρων ἀπαντᾷ τῷ
Πώρῳ, καὶ ἐπιστήσας τὸν ἵππον, τό τε μέγεθος ἐθαύμαζεν ὑπὲρ πέντε
πήχεις μάλιστα ξυμβαῖνον, ~καὶ τὸ κάλλος τοῦ Πώρου~, καὶ ὅτι οὐ
δεδουλωμένος τῇ γνώμῃ ἐφαίνετο, etc.
We see here how Alexander was struck with the stature and
personal beauty of Porus, and how much these visual impressions
contributed to determine, or at least to strengthen, his
favorable sympathies towards the captive prince. This illustrates
what I have observed in the last chapter, in recounting his
treatment of the eunuch Batis after the capture of Gaza; that
the repulsive appearance of Batis greatly heightened Alexander’s
indignation. With a man of such violent impulses as Alexander,
these external impressions were of no inconsiderable moment.
[540] These operations are described in Arrian, v. 9. v. 19 (we
may remark that Ptolemy and Aristobulus, though both present,
differed on many points, v. 14); Curtius, viii. 13, 14; Diodor.
xvii. 87, 88. According to Plutarch (Alex. 60), Alexander dwelt
much upon the battle in his own letters.
There are two principal points—Jelum and Julalpoor—where high
roads from the Indus now cross the Hydaspes. Each of these
points have been assigned by different writers, as the probable
scene of the crossing of the river by Alexander. Of the two
Jelum (rather higher up the river than Julalpoor) seems the more
probable. Burnes points out that near Jelum the river is divided
into five or six channels with islands (Travels, vol. ii. ch. 2.
p. 50, 2nd ed.). Captain Abbott (in the Journal of the Asiatic
Society, Calcutta, Dec. 1848) has given an interesting memoir on
the features and course of the Hydaspes a little above Jelum,
comparing them with the particulars stated by Arrian, and showing
highly plausible reasons in support of this hypothesis—that the
crossing took place near Jelum.
Diodorus mentions a halt of thirty days, after the victory (xvii.
89), which seems not probable. Both he and Curtius allude to
numerous serpents, by which the army was annoyed between the
Akesines and the Hydraotes (Curtius, ix. 1, 11).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account