The Museum of Alexandria (with its library) must be carefully
distinguished from the city and the people. It was an artificial
institution, which took its rise altogether from the personal
taste and munificence of the earlier Ptolemies, especially the
second. It was one of the noblest and most useful institutions
recorded in history, and forms the most honorable monument of
what Droysen calls the _hellenistic_ period, between the death
of Alexander and the extension of the Roman empire into Asia.
But this Museum, though situated at Alexandria, had no peculiar
connection with the city or its population; it was a College of
literary Fellows (if we may employ a modern word) congregated
out of various Grecian towns. Eratosthenes, Kallimuchus,
Aristophanes, Aristarchus, were not natives of Alexandria.
Thus much is necessary in order to understand the bearing of
Alexander’s conquests, not only upon the hellenic population, but
upon hellenic attributes and peculiarities. While crushing the Greeks
as communities at home, these conquests opened a wider range to the
Greeks as individuals abroad; and produced—perhaps the best of all
their effects—a great increase of intercommunication, multiplication
of roads, extension of commercial dealing, and enlarged facilities
for the acquisition of geographical knowledge. There already
existed in the Persian empire an easy and convenient royal road
(established by Darius son of Hystaspes and described as well as
admired by Herodotus) for the three months’ journey between Sardis
and Susa; and there must have been another regular road from Susa
and Ekbatana to Baktria, Sogdiana, and India. Alexander, had he
lived, would doubtless have multiplied on a still larger scale the
communications both by sea and land between the various parts of his
world-empire. We read that among the gigantic projects which he was
contemplating when surprised by death, one was, the construction of
a road all along the northern coast of Africa, as far as the Pillars
of Herakles.[651] He had intended to found a new maritime city on
the Persian Gulf, at the mouth of the Euphrates, and to incur much
outlay for regulating the flow of water in its lower course. The
river would probably have been thus made again to afford the same
conveniences, both for navigation and irrigation, as it appears to
have furnished in earlier times under the ancient Babylonian kings.
Orders had been also given for constructing a fleet to explore the
Caspian Sea. Alexander believed that sea to be connected with the
Eastern Ocean,[652] and intended to make it his point of departure
for circumnavigating the eastern limits of Asia, which country
yet remained for him to conquer. The voyage already performed by
Nearchus, from the mouth of the Indus to that of the Euphrates, was
in those days a splendid maritime achievement; to which another
still greater was on the point of being added—the circumnavigation
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account