He had every motive,
not merely from ambition, of conquest, but even from the necessities
of defence, to turn them to account: and he brought to the task
military genius and aptitude of the highest order. In arms, in
evolutions, in engines, in regimenting, in war-office arrangements,
he introduced important novelties; bequeathing to his successors the
Macedonian military system, which, with improvements by his son,
lasted until the conquest of the country by Rome, near two centuries
afterwards.
[116] Isokrates, in several of his discourses, notes the gradual
increase of these mercenaries—men without regular means of
subsistence, or fixed residence, or civic obligations. Or. iv.
(Panegyr.) s. 195; Or. v. (Philippus), s. 112-142; Or. viii. (De
Pace), s. 31-56.
[117] Xenoph. Magist. Equit. ix. 4. Οἶδα δ᾽ ἐγὼ καὶ
Λακεδαιμονίοις τὸ ἱππικὸν ἀρξάμενον εὐδοκιμεῖν, ἐπεὶ ξένους
ἱππέας προσέλαβον· καὶ ἐν ταῖς ἄλλαις πόλεσι πανταχοῦ τὰ ξενικὰ
ὁρῶ εὐδοκιμοῦντα.
Compare Demosth. Philippic. i. p. 46; Xenoph. Hellenic. iv. 4,
14; Isokrates, Orat. vii. (Areopagit.), s. 93.
[118] For an explanation of the improved arming of peltasts
introduced by Iphikrates, see Vol. IX. Ch. lxxv. p. 335 of this
History. Respecting these improvements, the statements both
of Diodorus (xv. 44) and of Nepos are obscure. MM. Rüstow and
Köchly (in their valuable work, Geschichte des Griechischen
Kriegswesens, Aarau, 1852, B. ii. p. 164) have interpreted the
statements in a sense to which I cannot subscribe. They think
that Iphikrates altered not only the arming of peltasts, but also
that of hoplites; a supposition, which I see nothing to justify.
[119] Besides the many scattered remarks in the Anabasis, the
Cyropædia is full of discussion and criticism on military
phænomena. It is remarkable to what an extent Xenophon had
present to his mind all the exigencies of war, and the different
ways of meeting them. See as an example, Cyropæd. vi. 2; ii. 1.
The work on sieges, by Æneas (Poliorketica), is certainly
anterior to the military improvements of Philip of Macedon:
probably about the beginning of his reign. See the preface
to it by Rüstow and Köchly, p. 8, in their edition of Die
Griechischen Kriegs-schriftsteller, Leips. 1853. In this work,
allusion is made to several others, now lost, by the same
author—Παρασκευαστικὴ βίβλος, Ποριστικὴ Βίβλος, Στρατοπεδευτικὴ,
etc.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account