[145] Livy. xlii. 51; xliv. 46, also the comparison in Strabo,
xvi. p. 752, between the military establishments of Seleukus
Nikator at Apameia in Syria, and those of Philip at Pella in
Macedonia.
[146] Justin, xi. 6. About the debt of 500 talents left by
Philip, see the words of Alexander, Arrian, vii. 9, 10. Diodorus
affirms (xvi. 8) that Philip’s annual return from the gold mines
was 1000 talents; a total not much to be trusted.
This scientific organization of military force, on a large scale and
with all the varieties of arming and equipment made to co-operate
for one end, is the great fact of Macedonian history. Nothing of the
same kind and magnitude had ever before been seen. The Macedonians,
like Epirots and Ætolians, had no other aptitude or marking quality
except those of soldiership. Their rude and scattered tribes manifest
no definite political institutions and little sentiment of national
brotherhood; their union was mainly that of occasional fellowship
in arms under the king as chief. Philip the son of Amyntas was the
first to organize this military union into a system permanently and
efficaciously operative, achieving by means of it conquests such as
to create in the Macedonians a common pride of superiority in arms,
which served as substitute for political institutions or nationality.
Such pride was still farther exalted by the really superhuman career
of Alexander. The Macedonian kingdom was nothing but a well-combined
military machine, illustrating the irresistible superiority of the
rudest men, trained in arms and conducted by an able general, not
merely over undisciplined multitudes, but also over free, courageous,
and disciplined, citizenship with highly gifted intelligence.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account