History of Human SocietyBlackmar, Frank W. (Frank Wilson)
History
History of Human Society
Blackmar, Frank W. (Frank Wilson)
Civilization; Progress; Sociology
Zeno is said to have been the most remarkable of this school. He held
that if there was a distinction between _being_ and _not being_, only
_being_ existed. This led him to the final assumption that the laws of
nature are unchangeable and God remains permanent. His method of
reasoning was to reduce the opposite to absurdity.
Upon the whole, the Eleatic philosophy is one relating to knowledge and
being, which considered thought primarily as dependent upon being. It
holds closely to monism, that is, that nature and mind are of the same
substance; yet there is a slight distinction, for there is really a
dualism expressed in knowledge and being. Many other philosophers
followed, who discoursed upon nature, mind, and being, but they arrived
at no definite conclusions. The central idea in the early philosophy
up to this time was to account for the existence and substance of
nature. It gave little consideration to man in himself, and said
little of the supernatural. Everything was speculative in nature,
hypothetical in proposition, and deductive in argument. The Greek
mind, departing from its dependence upon mythology, began boldly to
assert its ability to find out nature, but ended in a scepticism as to
its power to ascertain certainty. There was a final determination as
to the distinction of reality as external to mind, and this represents
the best product of the early philosophers.
{221}
_The Sophists_.--Following the Eleatics was a group of philosophers
whose principle characteristic was scepticism. Man, not nature, was
the central idea in their philosophy, and they changed the point of
view from objective to subjective contemplation. They accomplished
very little in their speculation except to shift the entire attitude of
philosophy from external nature to man. They were interested in the
culture of the individual, yet, in their psychological treatment of
man, they relied entirely upon sense perception. In the consideration
of man's ethical nature they were individualistic, considering private
right and private judgment the standards of truth. They led the way to
greater speculation in this subject and to a higher philosophy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account