History of Human SocietyBlackmar, Frank W. (Frank Wilson)
History
History of Human Society
Blackmar, Frank W. (Frank Wilson)
Civilization; Progress; Sociology
_The Feudal Lord and the Towns_.--Feudalism made its stronghold in
country life. The baronial castle was built away from cities and
towns--in a locality favorable for defense. This increased the
importance of country life to a great extent, and placed the feudal
lord in command of large tracts of territory. Many of the cities and
towns were for a time accorded the municipal privileges that had been
granted them under Roman rule; but in time these wore away, and the
towns, with a few exceptions, became included in large feudal tracts,
and were held, with other territory, as feudatories. In Italy, where
feudalism was less powerful, the greater barons were obliged to build
their castles in the towns, or, indeed, to unite with the towns in
government. But in France and Germany, and even to a certain extent in
England, the feudal lord kept aloof from the town.
There was, consequently, no sympathy existing between the feudal lord
and the people of the cities. It was his privilege to collect feudal
dues and aids from the cities, and beyond this he cared nothing for
their welfare. It became his duty and privilege to hold the baronial
court in the towns at intervals and to regulate their internal affairs,
but he did this through a subordinate, and troubled himself little
about any regulation or administration except to further his own ends.
{330}
_The Rise of Free Cities_.--Many of the towns were practically run by
the surviving machinery of the old Roman municipal system, while many
were practically without government except the overlordship of the
feudal chief by his representative officer. The Romans had established
a complete system of municipal government in all their provinces. Each
town or city of any importance had a complete municipal machinery
copied after the government of the imperial city. When the Roman
system began to decay, the central government failed first, and the
towns found themselves severed from any central imperial government,
yet in possession of machinery for local self-government. When the
barbarians invaded the Roman territory, and, avoiding the towns,
settled in the country, the towns fell into the habit of managing their
own affairs as far as feudal regime would permit.
It appears, therefore, that the first attempts at local self-government
were made in the cities and towns. In fact, liberty of government was
preserved in the towns, through the old Roman municipal life, which
lived on, and, being shorn of the imperial idea, took on the spirit of
Roman republicanism. It was thus that the principles of Roman
municipal government were kept through the Middle Ages and became
useful in the modern period, not only in developing independent
nationality but in perpetuating the rights of a people to govern
themselves.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account