History of Human SocietyBlackmar, Frank W. (Frank Wilson)
History
History of Human Society
Blackmar, Frank W. (Frank Wilson)
Civilization; Progress; Sociology
The complete development and extension of scholastic philosophy did not
come until the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries. The term
"scholastics" was first applied to those who taught in the cloister
schools founded by Charlemagne. It was at a later period applied to
the teachers of the seven liberal arts--grammar, rhetoric, and
dialectic, in the _Trivium,_ and arithmetic, geometry, music, and
astronomy, in the _Quadrivium_. Finally it was applied to all persons
who occupied themselves with science or philosophy. Scholastic
philosophy in its completed state represents an attempt to harmonize
the doctrines of the church with Aristotelian philosophy.
There were three especial doctrines developed in the scholastic
philosophy, called respectively nominalism, realism, and conceptualism.
The first asserted that there are no generic {354} types, and
consequently no abstract concepts. The formula used to express the
vital point in nominalism is "_Universalia post rem_." Its advocates
asserted that universals are but names. Roscellinus was the most
important advocate of this doctrine. In the fourteenth century William
of Occam revived the subject of nominalism, and this had much to do
with the downfall of scholasticism, for its inductive method suggested
the acquiring of knowledge through observation.
Realism was a revival of the Platonic doctrine that ideas are the only
real things. The formula for it was "_Universalia ante rem_." By it
the general name preceded that of the species. Universal concepts
represent the real; all else is merely illustrative of the real. The
only real sphere is the one held in the mind, mathematically correct in
every way. Balls and globes and other actual things are but the
illustrations of the genus. Perhaps Anselm was the strongest advocate
of this method of reasoning.
It remained for Abelard to unite these two theories of philosophical
reasoning into one, called conceptualism. He held that universals are
not ideals, but that they exist in the things themselves. The formula
given was "_Universalia in re_." This was a step in advance, and laid
something of a foundation for the philosophy of classification in
modern science.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account