History of Human SocietyBlackmar, Frank W. (Frank Wilson)
History
History of Human Society
Blackmar, Frank W. (Frank Wilson)
Civilization; Progress; Sociology
_Moral Conditions_.--The slow development of altruistic notions
presages a deficiency of moral action in the early stages of human
progress. True it is that moral conditions seem never to be entirely
wanting in this early period. There are many conflicting accounts of
the moral practice of different savage and barbarous tribes when first
discovered by civilized man. Tribes differ much in this respect, and
travellers have seen them from different standpoints. Wherever a
definite moral practice cannot be observed, it may be assumed that the
standard is very low. Moral progress seems to consist in the
constantly shifting standards of right and wrong, of justice and
injustice. Perhaps the moral action of the savage should be viewed
from two standpoints--namely, the position of the average savage of the
tribe, and from the vantage of modern ethical standards. It is only by
considering it from these two views that we have the true estimation of
his moral status. There must be a difference between conventionality
and morality, and many who have judged the moral status of {118} the
savage have done so more from a conventional than from a moral
standard. True that morality must be judged from the individual motive
and from social effects of individual action. Hence it is that the
observance of conventional rules must be a phase of morality; yet it is
not all of morality. Where conventionality does not exist, the motive
of action must be the true moral test.
The actions of some savages and of barbarous people are revolting in
the extreme, and so devoid of sympathy for the sufferings of their
fellow-beings as to lead us to assume that they are entirely without
moral sentiment. The repulsive spectacle of human sacrifice is
frequently brought about by religious fervor, while the people have
more or less altruistic practice in other ways. This practice was
common to very many tribes, and indeed to some nations entering the
pale of civilization. Cannibalism, revolting as it may seem, may be
practised by a group of people which, in every other respect, shows
moral qualities. It is composed of kind husbands, mothers, brothers,
and sisters, who look after each other's welfare. The treatment of
infants, not only by savage tribes but by the Greek and Roman nations
after their entrance into civilized life, represents a low status of
morality, for it was the common custom to expose infants, even in these
proud nations. The degraded condition of woman, as slave and tool of
man in the savage state, and indeed in the ancient civilization, does
not speak well for the high standard of morality of the past. More
than this, the disregard of the rights of property and person and the
common practice of revolting brutality, are conclusive evidence of the
low moral status of early mankind.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account