History of Indian and Eastern ArchitectureFergusson, James
History
History of Indian and Eastern Architecture
Fergusson, James
Architecture -- India; Architecture, Asian
Though the rails surrounding the topes at Sanchi are not, in themselves,
so interesting as those at Buddh Gaya and Bharhut, still they are useful
in exhibiting the various steps by which the modes of decorating rails
were arrived at, and the torans or gateways of the great rail are quite
unequalled by any other examples known to exist in India. The rail that
surrounds the great tope may be described as a circular enclosure 140
ft. in diameter, but not quite regular, being elliptical on one side, to
admit of the ramp or stairs leading to the berm or procession-path
surrounding the monument. As will be seen from the annexed woodcut (No.
29), it consists of octagonal pillars 8 ft. in height, and spaced 2 ft.
apart. These are joined together at the top by a rail 2 ft. 3 in. deep,
held in its position by a tenon cut on the top of the pillars, as at
Stonehenge; between the pillars are three intermediate rails, which are
slipped into lens-shaped holes, on either side, the whole showing how
essentially wooden the construction is. The pillars, for instance, could
not have been put up first, and the rails added afterwards. They must
have been inserted into the right or left hand posts, and supported
while the next pillar was pushed laterally, so as to take their ends,
and when the top rail was shut down the whole became mortised together
as a piece of carpentry, but not as any stone-work was done, either
before or afterwards.
[Illustration: 30. Rail, No. 2 Tope, Sanchi. (From a Drawing by Colonel
Maisey.)]
The next stage in rail design is exemplified in that of No. 2 Tope,
Sanchi (Woodcut No. 30); there circular discs are added in the centre of
each pillar, and semicircular plates at top and bottom. In carpentry the
circular ones would represent a great nail meant to keep the centre bar
in its place; the half discs, top and bottom, metal plates to strengthen
the junctions--and this it seems most probably may really have been the
origin of these forms.
[Illustration: 31. Representation of Rail. (From a Bas-relief at
Amravati.)]
If from this we attempt to follow the progress made in the ornamentation
of these rails, it seems to have been arrived at by placing a circular
disc in each of the intermediate rails, as shown in the woodcut (No.
31), copied from a representation of the outer face of the Amravati
rail, carved upon it. In the actual rail the pillars are proportionally
taller and the spaces somewhat wider, but in all other respects it is
the same--it has the same zöophorus below, and the same conventional
figures bearing a roll above, both which features are met with almost
everywhere.
[Illustration: 32. Rail in Gautamiputra Cave, Nassick.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account