History of Indian and Eastern ArchitectureFergusson, James
History
History of Indian and Eastern Architecture
Fergusson, James
Architecture -- India; Architecture, Asian
Two of the topes are of the largest size known: one, the Abhayagiri, was
erected B.C. 88; its dome is exactly hemispherical, and described with a
radius of 180 ft., being thus more than 1100 ft. in circumference, and
with the base and spire making up a total elevation of 244 ft., which is
only 16 ft. less than the traditional height of 120 cubits assigned to
it in the ‘Mahawanso.’[231] It was erected by a king Walagambahu, to
commemorate his reconquest of his kingdom from a foreign usurper who had
deposed him and occupied his throne for about sixteen years.
The second tope is the Jetawana, erected by a king Mahasena A.D. 275. In
form and dimensions it is almost identical with the last described,
though somewhat more perfect in outline, and a few feet higher, owing
probably to its being more modern than its rival. These two were
commemorative monuments, and not relic shrines.
Next to these, but far more important from its sacredness, is the
Ruanwelli dagoba, erected by king Duttagaimuni, between the years 161
and 137 B.C., over a very imposing collection of relics, of which a full
account is given in the 31st chapter of the ‘Mahawanso.’ Its dimensions
are very similar to those of the two last described, but it has been so
much defaced, partly by violence, and partly, it seems, from a failure
of the foundations, that it is not easy to ascertain either its original
shape or size. The same king erected another smaller tope, 260 ft. in
diameter. It is now known as the Mirisiwellya. Like the last described
it is very much ruined, and not particularly interesting either from its
form or history.
[Illustration: 98. Elevation of front of Staircase, Ruanwelli Dagoba. No
scale.]
Some excavations that have recently been undertaken have disclosed the
fact that the Ruanwelli dagoba had at its base three offsets, or
procession paths, rising like steps, one behind and above the other, but
with no ornament now apparent, except a plain Buddhist rail of two bars
on the outer edge of the two lower ones, and of an elephant cornice to
the upper. It can hardly, however, be doubted that the inner faces were
originally plastered, and painted with historical scenes. On each of the
four fronts of this dagoba was an ornamental projection containing and
partially concealing the flights of steps by which access was had to
these galleries.[232] From the photographs, it is not clear where the
steps were that lead to the first, but those leading from the first to
the second and third were arranged like those at Sanchi (Woodcut No. 11)
behind this frontispiece. Without a plan, however, it is difficult to
make out exactly what the arrangement may have been.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account