History of Indian and Eastern ArchitectureFergusson, James
History
History of Indian and Eastern Architecture
Fergusson, James
Architecture -- India; Architecture, Asian
There are few of the problems connected with this branch of our subject
so obscure and so puzzling as those connected with the early history of
the Architecture of the Jains. When we first practically meet with it in
the early part of the 11th century at Abu, or at Girnar, it is a style
complete and perfect in all its parts, evidently the result of long
experience and continuous artistic development. From that point it
progresses during one or two centuries towards greater richness, but in
doing so loses the purity and perfection it had attained at the earlier
period, and from that culminating point its downward progress can be
traced through abundant examples to the present day. When, however, we
try to trace its upward progress the case is widely different. General
Cunningham has recently found some Jaina statues at Muttra, with dates
upon them apparently of 99 and 177 A.D.[248] If this is so, it is the
earliest material trace of Jainism that has yet been discovered, and
they must have been associated with buildings which may yet reward the
explorer. From this time forward, till the 11th century, we have only
fragments of temples of uncertain origin and date, and all in so very
ruined a condition that they hardly assist us in our researches. Yet we
cannot doubt that the Jains did exist in India, and did build temples,
during the whole of this interval, and the discovery of some of them may
yet reward the industry of some future investigator.
Meanwhile one thing seems tolerably clear, that the religions of the
Buddhists and that of the Jains were so similar to one another both in
their origin, and their development and doctrines, that their
architecture must also at one time have been nearly the same. In
consequence of this, if we could trace back Jaina art from about the
year 1000, when practically we first meet it, to the year 600 or 700,
when we lose sight of Buddhist art, we should probably find the two very
much alike. Or if, on the other hand, we could trace Buddhist art from
A.D. 600 to A.D. 1000, we should as probably find it developing itself
into something very like the temples on Mount Abu, and elsewhere, at
that period of time.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account