History of Indian and Eastern ArchitectureFergusson, James
History
History of Indian and Eastern Architecture
Fergusson, James
Architecture -- India; Architecture, Asian
always four external pillars at the angles, so that the square shape is
retained, with twelve pillars, of which the eight internal pillars may
be taken as mere insertions to support the long architrave between the
four angular pillars.
[Illustration:
113. Diagrams of Roofing. 114.
]
[Illustration: 115. Diagram of Roofing.]
It is evident that here again we come to a limit beyond which we cannot
progress without using large and long stones. This was sometimes met by
cutting off the angles of the octagon, and making the lower course of
sixteen sides. When this has been done an awkwardness arises in getting
back to the square form. This was escaped from, in all the instances I
am acquainted with, by adopting circular courses for all above that with
sixteen sides. In many instances the lower course with sixteen sides is
altogether omitted, and the circles placed immediately on the octagon,
as in the temple at Vimala Sah (Woodcut No. 130, p. 236). It is
difficult to say how far this system might be carried constructively
without danger of weakness. The Indian domes seldom exceed 30 ft. in
diameter, but this may have arisen more from the difficulty of getting
architraves above 12 ft. or 13 ft. in length to support the sides, than
from any inability to construct domes of larger diameter in themselves.
This last difficulty was to some extent got over by a system of
bracketing, by which more than half the bearing of the architrave was
thrown on the capital of the column, as shown in Woodcut No. 116. Of
course this method might have been carried to any extent, so that a very
short architrave would suffice for a large dome; but whether this could
be done with elegance is another matter. The Indians seem to have
thought not; at least, so far as I know, they never carried it to any
extent. Instead of bracketing, however, they sometimes used struts, as
shown in Woodcut No. 116, but it is questionable whether that could ever
be made a really serviceable constructive expedient in stone
architecture.
[Illustration: 116. Diagram of Indian construction.
B. Form of bracket capital in the angle of an octagonal dome.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account