History of Indian and Eastern ArchitectureFergusson, James
History
History of Indian and Eastern Architecture
Fergusson, James
Architecture -- India; Architecture, Asian
By far the finest and most typical example of the Kashmiri style is the
temple of Marttand, situated about five miles east of Islamabad, the
ancient capital of the valley. It is the architectural lion of Kashmir,
and all tourists think it necessary to go into raptures about its beauty
and magnificence, comparing it to Palmyra or Thebes, or other wonderful
groups of ruins of the old world. Great part, however, of the admiration
it excites is due to its situation. It stands well on an elevated
plateau, from which a most extensive view is obtained, over a great part
of the valley. No tree or house interferes with its solitary grandeur,
and its ruins--shaken down apparently by an earthquake--lie scattered as
they fell, and are unobscured by vegetation, nor are they vulgarised by
any modern accretions. Add to this the mystery that hangs over their
origin, and a Western impress on its details unusual in the East, but
which calls back the memory of familiar forms and suggests memories that
throw a veil of poetry over its history more than sufficient to excite
admiration in the most prosaic spectators. When, however, we come to
reduce its dimensions to scale (Woodcut No. 160), and to examine its
pretensions to rank among the great examples of architectural art, the
rhapsodies of which it has been the theme seem a little out of place.
[Illustration: 160. Temple of Marttand. (From a drawing by General A.
Cunningham.) Scale 100 feet to 1 inch.]
The temple itself (Woodcut No. 161) is a very small building, being only
60 ft. in length by 38 ft. in width. The width of the façade, however,
is eked out by two wings or adjuncts, which make it 60 ft. As General
Cunningham estimates that its height, when complete, was 60 ft. also, it
realises the problem the Jews so earnestly set themselves to solve--how
to build a temple with the three dimensions equal, but yet should not be
a cube. Small, however, as the Jewish temple was, it was more than twice
as large as this one. At Jerusalem the temple was 100 cubits, or 150 ft.
in length, breadth, and height.[309] At Marttand these dimensions were
only 60 ft. But it is one of the points of interest in the Kashmiri
temple that it reproduces in plan, at least, the Jewish temple more
nearly than any other known building.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account