History of Indian and Eastern ArchitectureFergusson, James
History
History of Indian and Eastern Architecture
Fergusson, James
Architecture -- India; Architecture, Asian
It is old, but I am afraid the traditions that connect its foundation
with Hiranya Verma of Kashmir, in the beginning of the 6th century, on
which I was at one time inclined to rely,[381] are of too impalpable a
nature to be depended upon. I see no great reason for doubting that
there may have been a connexion between the kings of Chola and those of
Kashmir at the period; but I cannot see anything in this temple either
of so early an age, or any feature in the style of Kashmiri
architecture. On the other hand, the foundation of the temple appears to
be clearly described in the following passage of the Kongadesa Raja
Kal:--“Vira Chola Raya (A.D. 927 to 977) one day saw on the sea-shore
the Sabhápati of Chillambara (Siva), attended by Parvati, dancing and
beating the damaraka (a kind of drum); he therefore expended great sums
of money in building the Kanaka, or Golden Sabha.”[382] A little further
on, it is said, “Ari Vari Deva (A.D. 1004), observing that his
grandfather had built only a Kanaka Sabhá to the Chillambara deity, he
built gopuras, maddals (enclosures), madapanas (image-houses), sabhás
(holy places or apartments), and granted many jewels to the deity.” If
this last could be applied to the great enclosure, it would be a most
important date; but on a careful examination of the whole circumstances
of the case I feel convinced that these passages refer only to the two
inner enclosures, B B, at the west end of the tank (Woodcut No. 196).
They, indeed, measuring about 320 ft. square, appear to have been the
whole of the original temple, at least in the 10th and 11th centuries,
always supposing
[Illustration: 196. Plan of Temple of Chillambaram.
(From a Plan by Admiral Paris, in ‘Tour du Monde,’ vol. xvi. p. 35.)]
that any part of the building is really as old as this. On the whole,
however, I am inclined to believe that this inner temple is really the
one referred to in the above extract. The temple of Parvati, C, on the
north of the tank, was added afterwards, most probably in the 14th or
15th century, and to that age the great gopuras and the second enclosure
also belong. The hall of 1000 columns, E, was almost certainly erected
between 1595 and 1685, at which time, we learn from the Mackenzie MSS.,
the kings of the locality made many donations to the fane.[383] It was
then, also, in all probability, the outer enclosure was commenced; but
it never was carried out, being in most places only a few feet above the
foundation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account