History of Indian and Eastern ArchitectureFergusson, James
History
History of Indian and Eastern Architecture
Fergusson, James
Architecture -- India; Architecture, Asian
At Andher, about five miles west of Bhojpur, is a fine group of three
small, but very interesting topes. With those above enumerated, this
makes up about sixty distinct and separate topes, in this small
district, which certainly was not one of the most important in India in
a religious point of view, and consequently was probably surpassed by
many, not only in the number but in the splendour of its religious
edifices.[77]
Without more data than we at present possess, it is of course impossible
to speak with certainty with regard to the age of this group of topes,
but, so far as can be at present ascertained, there seems no reason for
assuming that any of them are earlier than the age of Asoka, B.C. 250,
nor is it probable that any of them can be of later date than the era of
Salivahana, A.D. 79, or say after the first century of our era. Their
rails may be later, but the topes themselves seem all to be included
within these three centuries and a half.
TOPES AT SARNATH AND IN BEHAR.
Not only is there no other group of topes in India Proper that can be
compared, either in extent or in preservation, to those of Bhilsa, but
our knowledge of the subject is now so complete that it is probably safe
to assert that only two, or at most three, topes exist between the
Sutlej and the sea, sufficiently perfect to enable their form and
architectural features to be distinguished. There are, of course,
numerous mounds near all the Buddhist cities which mark the site, and
many of which probably hide the remains, of some of the hundreds of
stupas or dagobas mentioned by the Chinese Pilgrims, besides many that
they failed to distinguish. All, however, with the fewest possible
exceptions, have perished; nor is it difficult to see why this should be
so. All, or nearly all, were composed of brick or small stones, laid
either without mortar, or with cement that was little better than mud.
They consequently, when desecrated and deserted, formed such convenient
quarries for the villagers, that nearly all have been utilised for
building huts and houses of the Hindus, or the mosques of the
iconoclastic Mussulmans. Their rails, being composed of larger stones
and not so easily removed, have in some instances remained, and some
will no doubt be recovered when looked for; and as these, in the earlier
ages at least, were the iconostasis of the shrine, their recovery will
largely compensate for the loss of the topes which they surrounded.
[Illustration: 14. Tope at Sarnath, near Benares. (From a Photograph.)]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account