History of Indian and Eastern ArchitectureFergusson, James
History
History of Indian and Eastern Architecture
Fergusson, James
Architecture -- India; Architecture, Asian
In his excavations, General Cunningham found, buried in the solid
masonry, at the depth of 10½ ft. from the summit, a large stone on
which was engraved the usual Buddhist formula, “Ye dharmma hetu,” &c.,
in characters belonging to the 7th century, from which he infers that
the monument belongs to the 6th century. To me it appears so extremely
improbable that men should carefully engrave such a formula on a stone,
and then bury it ten or twelve feet in a mass of masonry which they must
have hoped would endure for ever, that I cannot accept the conclusion.
It seems to me much more probable that it may have belonged to some
building which this one was designed to supersede, or to have been the
pedestal of some statue which had been disused, but which from its age
had become venerable, and was consequently utilised to sanctify this
new erection. I am consequently much more inclined to adopt the
tradition preserved by Captain Wilford,[79] to the effect that the
Sarnath monument was erected by the sons of Mohi Pala, and destroyed
(interrupted?) by the Mahomedans, in 1017, before its completion.[80]
The form of the monument, the character of its sculptured ornaments, the
unfinished condition in which it is left, and indeed the whole
circumstances of the case, render this date so much the most probable
that I feel inclined to adopt it almost without hesitation.
[Illustration: 15. Panel on the Tope at Sarnath. (From a Photograph.)]
The other Bengal tope existing nearly entire is known as Jarasandha Ka
Baithak. General Cunningham state its dimensions to be 28 ft. in
diameter by 21 ft. in height, resting on a basement 14 ft. high, so that
its total height, when complete, may have been about 55 ft.[81] As it
was not mentioned by Fa Hian, A.D. 400, and is by Hiouen Thsang, A.D.
640, its age is probably, as General Cunningham states, intermediate
between these dates, or about A.D. 500.[82] It is a bold, fine tower,
evidently earlier than that at Sarnath, and showing nothing of the
tendency towards Hindu forms there displayed. It has, too, the remains
of a procession-path, or extended basement, which is wholly wanting at
Sarnath, but which is always found in the earlier monuments. It was
erected, as Hiouen Thsang tells us, in honour of a Hansa--goose--who
devoted itself to relieve the wants of a starving community of
Bhikshus.[83]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account