History of Indian and Eastern ArchitectureFergusson, James
History
History of Indian and Eastern Architecture
Fergusson, James
Architecture -- India; Architecture, Asian
It is not clear whether Kanishka was or was not the first Buddhist king
of this country; but, so far as is at present known, he seems to have
done for Buddhism in Gandhara exactly what Asoka did for that religion
in central India. He elevated it from its position as a struggling sect
to that of being the religion of the State. We know, however, that Asoka
himself sent missionaries to this country;[93] and, more than this, that
he engraved a complete set of his edicts on a rock at Kapurdigiri, 30
miles north-east from Peshawur, but we do not know what success they or
he attained. Certain it is, as Professor Wilson remarks, that “no coin
of a Greek prince of Bactria has ever been met with in any tope.”[94]
The local coins that are found in them all belong to dynasties
subsequent to the destruction of the Bactrian kingdom, and, according
to the same authority (p. 322), “were selected from the prevailing
currency, which was not of any remotely previous issue;” “while the
Greek Bactrian coins had long ceased to be current, though they had not,
perhaps, become so scarce as to be enshrined as rarities” (p. 44). Under
these circumstances, Professor Wilson arrives at the conclusion that the
topes “are undoubtedly all subsequent to the Christian Era” (p. 322). It
is true that some of the kings whose coins are found in the topes, such
as Hermæus, Azes, Kadphises, and others, may have lived prior to that
epoch, but none of their coins show a trace of Buddhism. On those of the
last-named king, it is also true that we find the trisul emblem of the
Buddhists on the reverse, but it is coupled with the bull and trident of
Siva in so remarkable a manner that it can hardly be doubted that the
monarch was a follower of the Hindu religion, though acknowledging the
presence of Buddhism in his realm.[95] With Kanishka, however, all this
is altered. He was a Buddhist, beyond all doubt; he held the convocation
called the third by the northern Buddhists--the fourth according to the
southern--at which Nagárjuna was apparently the presiding genius. From
that time the Thibetans, Burmese, and Chinese date the introduction of
Buddhism into their countries: not, however, the old simple Buddhism,
known as the Hinayana, which prevailed before, but the corrupt Mahayana,
which was fabled to have been preserved by the Nagas from the time of
Buddha’s death, and from whom Nagárjuna received it, and spread it from
Peshawur over the whole of northern and eastern Asia. It was precisely
the same revolution that took place in the Christian Church, about the
same time after the death of its founder. Six hundred years after
Christ, Gregory the Great established the hierarchical Roman Catholic
system, in supersession of the simpler primitive forms. Six hundred
years after the Nirvana, Nagárjuna introduced the complicated and
idolatrous Mahayna,[96] though, as we learn from the Chinese Pilgrims, a
small minority still adhered in after times to the lesser vehicule, or
Hinayana system.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account