History of Indian and Eastern ArchitectureFergusson, James
History
History of Indian and Eastern Architecture
Fergusson, James
Architecture -- India; Architecture, Asian
The principal tope of the group is, perhaps, the most remarkable of its
class in India, though inferior in size to several in Ceylon. It was
first noticed by Mountstuart Elphinstone, and a very correct view of it
published by him, with the narrative of his mission to Cabul in 1815. It
was afterwards thoroughly explored by General Ventura, in 1830, and a
complete account of his investigations published by Prinsep in the third
volume of his ‘Journal.’ Since then its basement has been cleared of the
rubbish that hid it to a depth of 12 ft. to 15 ft. all round by the
officers of the Public Works Department. They also made careful plans
and sections of the whole, manuscript copies of which are now before me.
From those it appears that the dome is an exact hemisphere, 127 ft. in
diameter, and consequently, as nearly as may be, 400 ft. in
circumference. The outer circle measures in like manner 159 ft. 2 in.,
or 500 ft. in circumference, and is ascended by four very grand flights
of steps, one in each face, leading to a procession-path 16 ft. in
width, ornamented both above and below by a range of dwarf pilasters,
representing the detached rail of the older Indian monuments. It is,
indeed, one of the most marked characteristics of these Gandhara topes,
that none of them possess, or ever seem to have possessed, any trace of
an independent rail; but all have an ornamental belt of pilasters,
joined generally by arches simulating the original rail. This can hardly
be an early architectural form, and leads to the suspicion that, in
spite of their deposits, their outward casing may be very much more
modern than the coins they contain.
The outward appearance of the Manikyala tope, in its present half-ruined
state, may be judged of from the view (Woodcut No. 21). All that it
really requires to complete its outline is the tee, which was an
invariable adjunct to these buildings; no other feature has wholly
disappeared. The restored elevation, half-section, half-elevation
(Woodcut No. 22), to the usual scale, 50 ft. to 1 in., will afford the
means of comparison with other monuments; and the section and elevation
of the base (Woodcut No. 23, next page) will explain its architectural
details in so far as they can be made out.
[Illustration: 21. View of Manikyala Tope. (From a Photograph.)]
[Illustration: 22. Restored Elevation of the Tope at Manikyala. Scale 50
ft. to 1 in.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account