History of Madeley: including Ironbridge, Coalbrookdale, and CoalportRandall, John
History
History of Madeley: including Ironbridge, Coalbrookdale, and Coalport
Randall, John
Madeley (Shropshire, England) -- History
them thy order for so doing, as well as thy contributing liberally as
above proposed, will be the most likely means to prevent the
commencement of mischief, the end of which, if once began, it is
impossible to ascertain.”
The letter goes on to state that the following sums had been subscribed:
George Forester, £105. Cecil Forester, £105. J. H. Browne, £105. the
Coalbrookdale Company, £105. and John Wilkinson, £50. In addition to
this the writer, Richard Reynolds, and J. H. Browne had consented to
advance £700. each to be repaid out of the corn sold at the reduced
price.
Mr. Reynolds concludes by saying, “such is the urgency of the temper of
the people, that there is not a day to lose if we are desirous to
preserve the poor from outrage, and most likely the country from plunder,
if not from blood.”
Periods of distress and panic arising from scarcity were not unfrequent
when wages were stationary, or comparatively so. Great changes had taken
place during the periods previously described. First, during feudal
times, here and elsewhere the great body of peasantry was composed of
persons who rented _small farms_, seldom exceeding twenty or thirty
acres, and who paid their rent either in kind or in agricultural labour
and services performed on the demesne of the landlord: secondly, of
_cottagers_, each of whom had a small croft or parcel of land attached to
his dwelling, and the privilege of turning out a cow, or pigs, or a few
sheep, into the woods, commons, and wastes of the manor. During this
period, the population derived its subsistence immediately from the
land;—the landowner from the produce of his demesne, cultivated partly by
his domestic slaves, but principally by the labour of the tenants and
cottiers attached to the manor; the tenants from the produce of their
little farms; and the cottiers from that of their cows and crofts, except
while working upon the demesne, when they were generally fed by the
landlord. The mechanics of the village, not having time to cultivate a
sufficient quantity of land, received a fixed allowance of agricultural
produce from each tenant.
Under the above system, not only the little farmer, but also the humblest
cottager, drew a very considerable portion of his subsistence directly
from the land. His cow furnished him with what is invaluable to a
labourer,—a store of milk in the summer months; his pig, fattened upon
the common and with the refuse vegetables of his garden, supplied him
with bacon for his winter consumption—and there were poultry besides.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account