History of merchant shipping and ancient commerce, Volume 2 (of 4)Lindsay, W. S. (William Schaw)
History
History of merchant shipping and ancient commerce, Volume 2 (of 4)
Lindsay, W. S. (William Schaw)
Commerce -- History; Shipping -- History; Steam navigation -- History
[Sidenote: Confederacy renewed when Bonaparte had risen to power.]
Such were the principles then hurled at England by Catherine of Russia,
who placed herself at the head of an armed neutrality, consisting
of Denmark, Sweden, and Russia. Lord North, for a while, evaded any
direct reply to them; but the northern powers naturally found zealous
supporters in the nations now at war with Great Britain. Thus the
contemporary declarations of France, Spain, and the United States
lauded the moderation and public spirit which Catherine had displayed,
while England maintained her principles inviolate. But it was only
at the close of the century that the northern confederacy attempted
to enforce their principles. Bonaparte had then concluded peace with
Germany and Naples, had compelled Spain to coerce the Portuguese so
as to destroy all English trade on the coast of Portugal, and had
stimulated the action of the northern powers, by inspiring the Emperor
Paul with an infatuation which could only succeed in men of weak minds
like himself. The avowed aim of Bonaparte was to close every port in
Europe against the merchant shipping of England, to combine the naval
forces of Spain, Holland and France so as to make them act in concert,
and, thus, if possible, to rescue the army he had left in Egypt.
[Sidenote: Capture of merchant vessels.]
England’s position had already become sufficiently perilous, owing to
the order of the National Convention of France, issued in May 1793, to
their ships of war and privateers not to respect British property in
neutral vessels—an exception, however, being promptly made in favour
of American vessels: a resolution which continued in force till the
seizure by the English of the fleet of United States vessels, laden
with provisions for France, forced the Convention to rescind their
order.
American vessels thus became liable to capture on both sides, and
continued so till the French government, hearing that Mr. Jay had been
sent to London to remonstrate against the capture by English cruisers
of American vessels, renewed the order in favour of the United States’
ships. When, however, the National Convention found that Mr. Jay’s
remonstrances, so far from producing the effect anticipated, had led
to the conclusion of a treaty of amity and commerce between the two
countries adverse to France, they again decreed that their conduct to
neutral flags would be regulated by that of their enemies. The French
did not conceal their displeasure against the Americans, whom they
accused of base ingratitude; although it was evident to the whole world
that the assistance France had previously rendered to the revolted
colonists was simply prompted by a desire to check the power of
England, and not from any real sympathy with the American cause.
[Sidenote: Do “free ships make free goods?”]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account