History of merchant shipping and ancient commerce, Volume 2 (of 4)Lindsay, W. S. (William Schaw)
History
History of merchant shipping and ancient commerce, Volume 2 (of 4)
Lindsay, W. S. (William Schaw)
Commerce -- History; Shipping -- History; Steam navigation -- History
But though an examination of the State papers collected by the
Americans themselves furnishes abundant proof of too many unblushing
acts of piracy committed by vessels built and equipped in American
ports, and frequently manned almost exclusively by citizens of the
United States, there is no reason to suppose that their lawless acts
were committed by the consent or knowledge of the American government.
When the arm of the law is not sufficiently strong, there are always
abundance of adventurers of all nations ready to take advantage
of its weakness and, in the name of neutrals or under the flag of
belligerents, as may best suit their purpose, to fit out from neutral
ports cruisers with no other object than plunder; and there were
too many of such vessels cruising about the ocean during the last
twelve years of the mighty struggle between France and England. The
government of the Federation was as yet incapable of controlling the
ardour, love of gain, and enterprise which render similar adventures
as fascinating as they are profitable; but it exclaimed incessantly
against both England and France for alleged breaches of the laws of
nations, and did not, or would not, see the violations committed by
their own or by professing citizens sailing under the flag of the
United States in vessels built and equipped in their own harbours, and
especially in the port of Baltimore, at that time, and for some years
afterwards celebrated for the construction of vessels of great beauty
and symmetry, and of extraordinary speed.
FOOTNOTES:
[307] ‘Reports, House of Representatives,’ Feb. 23, 1791.
[308] This “most favoured footing clause” has been a fruitful source of
reclamation between the two countries.
[309] The reader will find an account of the negotiations in Mr. Jay’s
correspondence, ‘Life of John Jay,’ New York, 1833.
[310] Mr. William Jay was the son and historian of his father, John
Jay, the ambassador from the United States (_vide_ vol. i. p. 324).
[311] The most ardent supporters of the war were the shipowners: the
Whigs and the Radicals did all they could to neutralise the power of
the executive.
[312] Privateering was finally abolished by the great Powers of Europe
March, 30, 1856; but the Americans refused to agree to this unless
all private property was made free from capture at sea. The right of
blockade was also proposed to be given up. This the English government
declined assenting to, asserting “that the system of commercial
blockade was essential to its naval supremacy.” During the recent civil
war in America all the great Powers agreed in disallowing privateering,
and it was also forbidden by the Treaty of Washington; hence, when
Jefferson Davis announced his intention of issuing “letters of marque,”
Lincoln replied that the officers and men in any such ships would be
shot as pirates.
[313] Of 404,135 pounds imported into the United States in 1792, no
less than 373,350 came from the West Indian islands.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account