History of merchant shipping and ancient commerce, Volume 4 (of 4)Lindsay, W. S. (William Schaw)
History
History of merchant shipping and ancient commerce, Volume 4 (of 4)
Lindsay, W. S. (William Schaw)
Commerce -- History; Shipping -- History; Steam navigation -- History
In 1844, Mr. Cunard brought into the service (partly in pursuance of
his contract) the _Cambria_ and _Hibernia_, each of 500 horse-power,
and of 1422 tons, with an average speed of 9¼ knots.
In 1848, the _America_, _Niagara_, _Europe_, and _Canada_ followed, so
as to meet the increasing wants of the trade and the ever increasing
demands of the public for greater speed and improved accommodation.
Each of these vessels was about 1820 tons and of 680 horse-power, with
an average speed of 10¼ knots an hour.
The success of the Cunard Company, created, as might have been
anticipated, much jealousy among the shareholders of the _Great
Western_ Steam-ship Company, who complained of a monopoly having been
granted to their injury and to that of other owners of steam-ships
engaged in the trade, or who were desirous of entering it. Although
no unfairness was alleged against Mr. Cunard and his partners, and no
valid charges could be raised against the manner in which the mail
services were performed, the _Great Western_ Company had sufficient
influence to obtain a parliamentary inquiry. They asked it, first, on
the broad grounds (which have since been frequently raised, and now
with much more show of reason than then), that the public was taxed for
a service from which one company alone derived the advantage, and which
could be equally well done and, at less expense, if mails were sent by
all steamers engaged in the trade, each receiving a certain amount of
percentage on the letters they carried; and, secondly, because their
company had been the first in the trade and had incurred great expense
and risk in developing steam communication between Great Britain and
the United States of America. But, after full inquiry, the committee
reported that the arrangements concluded with Messrs. Cunard, Burns,
and MacIver, were on terms more advantageous than any others which
could then be made, and that the service had been most efficiently
performed.[181]
[Sidenote: Comparative results of different vessels.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account