History of merchant shipping and ancient commerce, Volume 4 (of 4)Lindsay, W. S. (William Schaw)
History
History of merchant shipping and ancient commerce, Volume 4 (of 4)
Lindsay, W. S. (William Schaw)
Commerce -- History; Shipping -- History; Steam navigation -- History
[Sidenote: Complaints of the public.]
In process of time, and notably after the necessity of greater
economy in the public finances had been admitted, great discontent
was expressed through the press with regard to these very liberal
concessions,[273] which was materially aggravated by a statement, the
accuracy of which I have no means of testing, that the amount paid
for the West India mail service exceeded the sum received for postage
by 183,938_l._, and that, though the Brazil branch left a margin of
3478_l._ in favour of the Post-office, the direct loss to the public
amounted to no less than 180,460_l._ per annum.[274]
To most of these complaints the company was altogether indifferent,
believing them to have their origin in disappointment and jealousy;
but there was no answer to the well-founded remonstrances of the
colonists that the service was, after all, performed with great
irregularity. Indeed, it is beyond cavil that during their earlier
operations, the vessels did not arrive at the time named in the tables
of routes attached to the contract, that, for instance, the duplicate
correspondence from Chagres, sent round by way of New York in American
vessels, and thence by the Cunard or American steamers to Liverpool,
often arrived in England sooner than the original letters brought
directly by the Royal Mail vessels; and, further, that much confusion
was constantly caused by the non-arrival of the outward mails till days
after the dispatch of the homeward ones. Unnecessary delays also took
place in coaling at St. Thomas and in the receiving and transferring
freight there and elsewhere. There was also, it was alleged, a want of
sufficient steamers for the intercolonial service, while the occasional
negligence and incompetency of the commanders of the vessels led to a
needless loss of time between port and port; complaints were likewise
made of insufficiency of accommodation for passengers on some of
the intercolonial steamers, and, also, that a pernicious system of
gambling was permitted in the vessels of the main line. Some of these
complaints, as frequently happens under similar circumstances, were
frivolous and unwarrantable, but too many of them were unanswerable;
indeed the bitter attacks on the company might naturally have been
expected considering the numerous favours supposed to have been
conferred on it, and, above all, the notorious fact, that the contract
for the conveyance of the mails was never exposed to public competition.
[Sidenote: Improved prospects of the Company]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account