History of merchant shipping and ancient commerce, Volume 4 (of 4)Lindsay, W. S. (William Schaw)
History
History of merchant shipping and ancient commerce, Volume 4 (of 4)
Lindsay, W. S. (William Schaw)
Commerce -- History; Shipping -- History; Steam navigation -- History
As the Committee of the House of Commons had recommended immediate
action for the establishment of a regular overland mail service,
the Court of Directors were compelled to take the matter into their
serious consideration; but they had determined to leave for future
consideration the important question whether the communication should
be, in the first instance, from Bombay or from Calcutta, or according
to the combined plan suggested by the Bengal Steam Committee, in which
case the net charge should be divided equally between the Government
and the East India Company, so as to include the expense of the land
conveyance from the Euphrates and the Red Sea respectively to the
Mediterranean. After reviewing the relative advantages on the one hand
and the physical difficulties on the other of the two routes, with
the view of securing a regular communication throughout the year, the
Committee suggested an extension of the line of Malta packets to such
ports in Egypt and in Syria as would enable the communication between
England and India to be tested experimentally by both routes.
[Sidenote: Admiralty packets extended from Malta to Alexandria.]
In accordance with these recommendations the Admiralty extended,
in February 1835, the service of their mail-packets from Malta to
Alexandria; while the Court of Directors sent out instructions to the
Governor-General of India to forward the _Hugh Lindsay_ at appointed
periods to Suez. The character of the Euphrates route was also still
further explored by Colonel Chesney,[317] under the direction of the
East India Board, to whom this work had been entrusted, and, not long
afterwards, the home authorities established a dromedary post from
Baghdad to Damascus and Beyrout for the transmission of such mails as
might be sent by that route.
The beneficial effects of these arrangements were soon felt in India,
as would appear by a despatch from the Bombay Government to the Court
of Directors (September 1836), wherein it is stated “that the three
last overland mails have brought despatches from London to Bombay in
thirty-eight, forty-five, and sixty-four days, and those intended for
Calcutta have been forwarded in ten days more.” But as the despatch of
the 16th of September, which conveyed this information by way of Egypt,
did not reach England till the beginning of the following year, owing
to various delays between Bombay and Suez, it was resolved to place
larger and more powerful steamers on the Red Sea route—chiefly, as it
would seem, because neither the _Hugh Lindsay_ nor the _Enterprize_
could perform the passage against the south-west monsoon.
[Sidenote: Steamers of the Indian Navy.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account