History of merchant shipping and ancient commerce, Volume 4 (of 4)Lindsay, W. S. (William Schaw)
History
History of merchant shipping and ancient commerce, Volume 4 (of 4)
Lindsay, W. S. (William Schaw)
Commerce -- History; Shipping -- History; Steam navigation -- History
the case where an iron ship strikes upon a sharp pointed-like crag of
rock or coral reef with considerable force, it frequently happens that
a hole is made through the plate; but even when such an accident occurs
the damage is generally _local_, the parts not immediately subject to
the concussion remaining unhurt. No general leakage is, therefore,
consequent on such an accident, as would be the case in all vessels
built of wood.
[Sidenote: Affords greater capacity for stowage.]
As the hull of an iron ship is both thinner and considerably
lighter[122] than that of a wooden ship, an iron ship of the same
external dimensions as a wooden one has both greater capacity for
stowage and greater power to support the weights which may be put into
her. These differences vary in some degree with the dimensions and form
of the ship, being greater in proportion to the increased dimensions
of the ship. They may, of course, be determined by computation; but,
in all cases, an iron ship will carry considerably more cargo than a
wooden one of the same external dimensions.
Again, the consideration of economy must not be omitted in any
comparison of the merits of ships built entirely either of timber, or
of iron. The economy begins with the construction, for the original
cost of an iron ship is less than that of a wooden one, and, apart
altogether from her superior capacity for cargo, it runs on with the
course of the ship’s service as the result of several causes; as, for
instance, the smaller amount and less expensive character of repairs:
moreover, as it is not even yet known how long iron ships will last,
the precise saving from their use cannot be estimated. On the other
hand, the period of service of mercantile timber-built ships is
defined. If they reach or exceed thirty years’ service, they must be
ships of the very highest class as to quality[123], and must, indeed,
within that period have undergone frequent and very expensive repairs.
As iron ships are not subject to the same decay, at the same time that
accidental damages are generally repaired at a much less cost, every
item saved by the diminished charge for repairs is clear profit.
[Sidenote: Admiralty slow to adopt iron for ships of war.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account