Douza, who has collected and edited all that remains of the satires of Lucilius, mentions the names of not fewer than sixteen individuals, who are attacked by name in the course even of these fragments, among whom are Quintus Opimius, the conqueror of Liguria, Cæcilius Metellus, whose victories acquired him the sirname of Macedonianus, and Cornelius Lupus, at that time _Princeps Senatus_. Lucilius was equally severe on contemporary and preceding authors; Ennius, Pacuvius, and Attius, having been alternately satirized by him(415). In all this he indulged with impunity(416); but he did not escape so well from a player, whom he had ventured to censure, and who took his revenge by exposing Lucilius on the stage. The poet prosecuted the actor, and the cause was carried on with much warmth on both sides before the Prætor, who finally acquitted the player(417). The confidence of Lucilius in his powerful patrons, Scipio and Lælius, inspired this freedom; and it appears, in fact, to have so completely relieved him from all fear or restraint, that he boldly exclaims— —— “Cujus non audeo dicere nomen? Quid refert dictis ignoscat Mutius, an non?” It is chiefly to such support that the unbridled license of the old Roman satirists may be ascribed— —— “Unde illa priorum Scribendi quodcunque animo flagrante liberet Simplicitas(418).” —— The harsh and uncultivated spirit of the ancient Romans also naturally led to this species of severe and personal castigation; and it was not to be expected that in that age they should have drawn their pictures with the delicacy and generality which Horace has given to Offellus. Lucilius, however, did not confine himself to invectives on vicious mortals. In the first book of his satires, he appears to have declared war on the false gods of Olympus, whose plurality he denied, and ridiculed the simplicity of the people, who bestowed on an infinity of gods the venerable name of father, which should be reserved for one. Near the commencement of this book he represents an assembly of the gods deliberating on human affairs: “Consilium summis hominum de rebus habebant.” And, in particular, discussing what punishment ought to be inflicted on Rutilius Lupus, a considerable man in the Roman state, but noted for his wickedness and impiety, and so powerful that it is declared— “Si conjuret, populus vix totus satis est.” Jupiter expresses his regret that he had not been present at a former council of the gods, called to deliberate on this topic— “Vellem concilio vestrûm, quod dicitis, olim, Cælicolæ; vellem, inquam, adfuissem priore Concilio.” —— Jupiter having concluded, the subject is taken up by another of the gods, who, as Lactantius informs us, was Neptune(419); but being puzzled with its intricacy, this divinity declares it could not be explained, were Carneades himself (the most clear and eloquent of philosophers) to be sent up to them from Orcus: