8. _Compounds assumed to be determined by the Mechanical
Attraction of the Elements._--When, in consequence of the
investigations and discoveries of Newton and his
predecessors, the conception of mechanical force had become
clear and familiar, so far as the action of external forces
upon a body was concerned, it was very natural that the
mathematicians who had pursued this train of speculation
should attempt to apply the same conception to that mutual
action of the internal parts of a body by which they are
held together. Newton himself had pointed the way to this
attempt. In the Preface to the _Principia_, after speaking
of what he has done in calculating the effects of forces
upon the planets, satellites, &e., he adds, 'Would it were
permitted us to deduce the other phenomena of nature from
mechanical principles by the same kind of reasoning. For
many things move me to suspect that all these phenomena
depend upon certain forces, by which the particles of
bodies, through causes not yet known, are either urged
towards each other, and cohere according to regular figures,
or are repelled and recede from each other; which forces
being unknown, philosophers have hitherto made their
attempts upon nature in vain.' The same thought is at a
later period followed out further in one of the Queries at
the end of the Opticks[9\6]. 'Have not the small particles
of bodies certain Powers, Virtues, or Forces, by which they
act at a distance, not only upon the rays of light for
reflecting, refracting and inflecting them, but also upon
one another for producing a great part of the phenomena of
nature?' And a little further on he proceeds to apply this
expressly to chemical changes. 'When Salt of Tartar runs
_per deliquium_ [or as we now express it, deliquesces] is
not this done by an _attraction_ between the particles of
the Salt of Tartar and the particles of the water which
float in the air in {11} the form of vapours? And why does
not common salt, or saltpetre, or vitriol, run _per
deliquium_, but for want of such an attraction? or why does
not Salt of Tartar draw more water out of the air than in a
certain proportion to its quantity, but for want of an
attractive force after it is saturated with water?' He goes
on to put a great number of similar cases, all tending to
the same point, that chemical combinations cannot be
conceived in any other way than as an attraction of
particles.
[Note 9\6: Query 31.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account