3. What is here said may appear to be a denial of the real
existence of space. It must be observed, however, that we do
not deny, but distinctly assert, the existence of space as a
real and necessary condition of all objects perceived; and
that we not only allow that objects are seen external to us,
but we found upon the fact of their being so seen, our view
of the nature of space. If, however, it be said that we deny
the reality of space as an object or thing, this is true.
Nor does it appear easy to maintain that space exists as a
thing, when it is considered that this thing is infinite in
all its dimensions; and, moreover, that it is a thing,
which, being nothing in itself, exists only that other
things may exist in it. And those who maintain the real
existence of space, must also maintain the real existence of
time in the same sense. Now two infinite things, thus really
existing, and yet existing only as other things exist in
them, are notions so extravagant that we are driven to some
other mode of explaining the state of the matter.
4. Thus space is not an object of which we perceive the
properties, but a form of our perception; not a thing which
affects our senses, but an idea to which we conform the
impressions of sense. And its peculiarities appear to depend
upon this, that it is not only a form of sensation, but of
_intuition_; that in reference to space, we not only
perceive but _contemplate_ objects. We see objects in space,
side by side, exterior to each other; space, and objects in
so far as they occupy space, have parts exterior to other
parts; and have the whole thus made up by the juxtaposition
of parts. This mode of apprehension belongs only to the
ideas of space and time. Space and Time are made up of
parts, but Cause and Likeness are not apprehended as made up
of parts. And the term _intuition_ (in its rigorous sense)
is applicable only to that mode of contemplation in which we
thus look at objects as made up of parts, and apprehend the
relations of those parts at the same time and by the same
act by which we apprehend the objects themselves.
5. As we have said, space limited by _boundaries_ {97} gives
rise to various conceptions which we have often to consider.
Thus limited, space assumes _form_ or _figure_; and the
variety of conceptions thus brought under our notice is
infinite. We have every possible form of line, straight
line, and curve; and of curves an endless number;--circles,
parabolas, hyperbolas, spirals, helices. We have plane
surfaces of various shapes,--parallelograms, polygons,
ellipses; and we have solid figures,--cubes, cones,
cylinders, spheres, spheroids, and so on. All these have
their various properties, depending on the relations of
their boundaries; and the investigation of their properties
forms the business of the science of Geometry.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account