History of Spanish and Portuguese Literature (Vol 1 of 2)Bouterwek, Friedrich
History
History of Spanish and Portuguese Literature (Vol 1 of 2)
Bouterwek, Friedrich
Portuguese literature -- History and criticism; Spanish literature -- History and criticism
[284] This collection of the plays and other poems of Naharro is
mentioned by Nicolas Antonio, and also by Dieze. I have never seen it:
and in the numerous collections of Spanish dramas by various authors,
with which I am acquainted, I have sought in vain for the productions
of Naharro. Blankenburg speaks of them as if he had read them; and
Signorelli expressly says, that he has perused them all. Among the
passages quoted by the latter, in order to justify the contemptuous
tone in which he criticises the writings of Naharro, is a line of
corrupt Portuguese. May not this be Galician? The modern comic writers
of Spain occasionally make their clowns converse in the Galician
dialect.
[285] Cervantes attributes to himself the invention of dividing a drama
into three _jornadas_. How happens this? Cervantes was a vain man,
but not an empty boaster. He seems to have been totally unacquainted
with the dramas of Naharro, but he might have heard of the division of
plays into three _jornadas_, without retaining a distinct recollection
of the fact. In this way his memory may have deceived him, when he
supposed that the division originated with himself. And yet it is
singular enough that in his Galathea, he mentions, among other poets,
the _artificioso Torres Naharro_.
[286] Concerning these collections, see Dieze’s Remarks on Velasquez,
p. 316. I am acquainted with only two:--one is entitled, _Los Coloquios
Pastoriles de muy agraziada y apacible prosa, &c. por el excellente
poeta, y gracioso representante Lope de Rueda, sacados a luz por Juan
Timoneda; Sevilla_ 1576, in small octavo, printed in gothic characters.
The other is entitled: _Las segundas dos Comedias de Rueda_, without
date, but printed in the same type and form as the first mentioned
collection.
[287] The following specimen of the dialogue of these comedies is from
a scene in which a clown quarrels with his wife:--
_Gine._ Aun teneis lengua para hablar, anima de cantaro?
_Pablo._ Dote al diabro muger, no ternas un poco de miramiento.
Si quiera por las barbas de la merced que esta delante.
_Gine._ He callad anima de campana.
_Pab._ Que es anima de campana, muger?
_Gine._ Que? badajo como vos.
_Pab._ Badajo a vuestro marido? deme essegar rote vuessa merced.
_Gine._ Assi, garrote para mi, al fin no seriades vos hijo de
Guarniço el enxalmador, cura bestias.
_Pab._ Y parescete a ti mal, porque sea hijo de bendicion.
_Camilo._ Ay amarga, y como hijo de bendicion? &c.
[288] The emphatic praises of the publisher of the _Parnaso Español_,
represent Juan de la Cueva as a poet of the first rank. See the
literary notices prefixed to the eighth volume of that collection. The
works of Cueva are there mentioned with the dates of their various
editions. See also Dieze’s Remarks on Velasquez, p. 202.
[289] It may be found in the eighth vol. of the _Parnaso Español_ as it
was first printed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account