History of Spanish Literature, vol. 1 (of 3)Ticknor, George
History
History of Spanish Literature, vol. 1 (of 3)
Ticknor, George
Spanish literature -- History and criticism
[169] Dominacion de los Árabes, Tom. I., Prólogo, pp.
xviii.-xix., p. 169, and other places. But in a manuscript
preface to a collection which he called “Poesías Orientales
traducidas por Jos. Ant. Conde,” and which he never published,
he expresses himself yet more positively: “In the versification
of our Castilian ballads and _seguidillas_, we have received
from the Arabs _an exact type_ of their verses.” And again he
says, “From the period of the infancy of our poetry, we have
rhymed verses according to _the measures used by the Arabs
before the times of the Koran_.” This is the work, I suppose, to
which Blanco White alludes (Variedades, Tom. II. pp. 45, 46).
The theory of Conde has been often approved. See Retrospective
Review, Tom. IV. p. 31, the Spanish translation of Bouterwek,
Tom. I. p. 164, etc.
But though, from the air of historical pretension with which it
presents itself, there is something in this theory that bespeaks our
favor, yet there are strong reasons that forbid our assent to it.
For the earliest of the Spanish ballads, concerning which alone the
question can arise, have not at all the characteristics of an imitated
literature. Not a single Arabic original has been found for any one
of them; nor, so far as we know, has a single passage of Arabic
poetry, or a single phrase from any Arabic writer, entered directly
into their composition. On the contrary, their freedom, their energy,
their Christian tone and chivalrous loyalty, announce an originality
and independence of character that prevent us from believing they
could have been in any way materially indebted to the brilliant, but
effeminate, literature of the nation to whose spirit every thing
Spanish had, when they first appeared, been for ages implacably
opposed. It seems, therefore, that they must, of their own nature, be
as original as any poetry of modern times; containing, as they do,
within themselves proofs that they are Spanish by their birth, natives
of the soil, and stained with all its variations. For a long time, too,
subsequent to that of their first appearance, they continued to exhibit
the same elements of nationality; so that, until we approach the
fall of Granada, we find in them neither a Moorish tone, nor Moorish
subjects, nor Moorish adventures; nothing, in short, to justify us in
supposing them to have been more indebted to the culture of the Arabs
than was any other portion of the early Spanish literature.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account